1 Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8B7404947
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-1.307, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id GL4pXdaaIepM for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ACA404946
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so557937bwz.0
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
24 h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
\r
25 :subject; bh=3YijT0/gpSkeEGmSBqf5bLbM2EcxYmuxVlZuD6cad2k=;
\r
26 b=azhn1PN+lAm0/YbFXlbP1ryey0q+Bz14wPsD6Pps6Y8XohW19uoZZWx0dkYuQOsMlF
\r
27 /LHM4pfxAnC9GniqYBikrrT5Iiikz5X6qM3zWxp+WoNoNX550Qlyy5EVtZ0VyGmlcQyl
\r
28 F/XOavmRDL5r4maFRvce+HBvly/nlYuxdf/Ck=
\r
29 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
30 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject;
\r
31 b=xlasX+9mDRLvgB/UdlKFUrkvOOtTYZ3eDCzFoLqIXr2g0MXvCWXsknlki4iTQjtzFK
\r
32 ezr+xkxVwGFuetXf51rbFoaZTLidxpW4dyegF2aBu2XnAu+LqeQazpqGpK53TyZwe6K8
\r
33 ALlWzZOjluVsPOB2AGCM20eKyJWyVOpBQBjGQ=
\r
34 Received: by 10.204.155.69 with SMTP id r5mr149535bkw.0.1268784212714;
\r
35 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
36 Received: from localhost (physnat56.physics.umass.edu [128.119.50.56])
\r
37 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g18sm28272710bkw.7.2010.03.16.17.03.31
\r
38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
39 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Message-ID: <4ba01c54.9298cc0a.66cd.7695@mx.google.com>
\r
41 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
42 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
43 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
44 Subject: [notmuch] Tag search peculiarities
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:03:34 -0000
\r
61 While trying perfect my initial tagging script, I have run into a very strange
\r
62 set of issue. In my script, I use the following to exclude mailing list traffic
\r
65 notmuch tag -new tag:new and tag:list notmuch tag -new +inbox tag:new
\r
67 However, I found that mailing list traffic was still getting through.
\r
69 After investigating further, I found that any query in the form of "tag:inbox
\r
70 and tag:$TAG" would return no results. Strangely, all other combinations of tag
\r
71 searches (i.e. "tag:lkml and tag:unread") seem to work just fine.
\r
73 Has anyone else noticed this sort of behavior? Does the inbox tag have some
\r
74 special signifigance that I should know of? Is my index just FUBAR? (the ladder
\r
75 would be very strange considering it's only a few days old and I can't think of
\r
76 any crashes, etc. that might have corrupted it) Any ideas for debugging?
\r