1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEF2431FDB
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id kS2pFcAl16Px for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03901431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so3224695lah.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version
\r
27 :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
28 bh=Yin5tsVABDXxqRm3Mm/CG93eDWr41Si69XIY8QLJNHw=;
\r
29 b=cuS6/J2Vugt9qTX+3S0ZxIWJbkM2PJavS+TnwwVVGYsljavLltTKaKMXw5nnHADDef
\r
30 Wgborc9YE/a+RfUkV9psnZLlGmZIvbUL6m6J04qM8Mw3LwrhHJlw/PzBx9wcQv9ZsTw5
\r
31 HiR8gnrKVOWWke+Ad5oaC/+5WGydpVR5ERGYmxCEhcLp1l9hNc7Oz6kqgNLHNwR9iT8d
\r
32 kq+bybMxbAZBtBrvsAgSbUZDkSySFI6yVbUHDJZXA2VcN4JRu98gtnrXu3oPzJICbcQr
\r
33 aMO/1MIDmJZVOew74UWoG4sMS2MWkXA/JTXFf5x1epM5LNA0U7KMWY1tOjrumKG+JGbm
\r
35 Received: by 10.112.42.41 with SMTP id k9mr2736041lbl.96.1334440565393;
\r
36 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50dc00-68.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mm11sm13974042lab.2.2012.04.14.14.56.03
\r
40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
42 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
43 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
44 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler
\r
45 In-Reply-To: <87bomuf1i5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
46 References: <1327865624-7673-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
47 <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
48 <87hawmyt8k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
49 <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
50 <87bomucaq3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
51 <87r4vqdn5k.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
52 <87bomuf1i5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>User-Agent:
\r
53 Notmuch/0.12+81~g839a805 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
55 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:56:01 +0300
\r
56 Message-ID: <87lilydlla.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
60 ALoCoQkj8n1fhJIv/tZQ67DEhMtdu9FtxCRL60wHPucG3k/Z7DliEI3+R0tX0wgtyTevWMJZ6tYD
\r
61 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
62 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
64 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
65 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
68 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
69 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
70 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
71 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
72 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
73 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:56:07 -0000
\r
75 Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:
\r
77 > On Sat, Apr 14 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
78 >> I was doing this purely based on whether the patches apply or not.
\r
80 > I'm so sorry, Jani. You are correct that this patch requires a small
\r
81 > rebase fix to apply to master. I'm not sure how I missed it previously.
\r
83 No problem. Thanks for checking again; I was worried we might have a bug
\r