1 Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBE6431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id mIBviX-DW-p3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com (mail-ee0-f52.google.com
\r
19 [74.125.83.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
20 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
21 D4AE9431FAE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:59 -0700
\r
23 Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c50so5505965eek.25
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
\r
28 :user-agent; bh=RxFZx0bLmZaqbUKGHxmicEzXGudHp/W/6/iqECaoRKI=;
\r
29 b=H3lhAhzvAAfssBBTmiN6wfn9V+bH1mn5rPMK8LunH9WJn69xTPVgjvRDoD7qyHkJVn
\r
30 Mo8GnECtsCcdG3YQGmnvTlsSnSEAPuMHkGHR4ihiqhbXwyn95pmjnJdo/R9XBWRFsIYR
\r
31 T7g0KV+GKVMH3SFWRJpmAcPVaRJ+A60VRnuAuIuCZtaNtpU4fquieInk6cy4fZwYKndw
\r
32 VFQUZ8YoMD8CgB6qpLIsejgfvwu8tyK5oySMLIUvyey5tKiARsrLCHC5FbAvclBlEg8A
\r
33 j7dsyzbijQQQZBn0wv8qHB3MGVhFD+58HiSZBdUwyc2zx4e7j2ci/LKBgihe4OYURHJ/
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.14.177.196 with SMTP id d44mr40974041eem.35.1373543637224;
\r
36 Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com
\r
38 ([2001:610:120:3001:f2de:f1ff:fe37:c76c])
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w43sm68470911eez.6.2013.07.11.04.53.55
\r
40 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
42 Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 Sender: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>
\r
44 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:53:53 +0200
\r
45 From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
\r
46 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 Subject: Re: notmuch search --output=files error with AND NOT search terms
\r
48 Message-ID: <20130711115353.GA20266@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
\r
49 Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 References: <51DC0A16.5080704@2b1.de> <87mwpvd1fp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
51 <1373457313852-4028436.post@n3.nabble.com>
\r
52 <20130710125911.GA7198@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
\r
53 <1373531960691-4028438.post@n3.nabble.com>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
56 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
57 In-Reply-To: <1373531960691-4028438.post@n3.nabble.com>
\r
58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:54:06 -0000
\r
75 Disclaimer: I'm just a user, with almost no knowledge of notmuch
\r
78 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:39:20AM -0700, ingo wrote:
\r
80 > And both mails have the same message-id in the message header.
\r
82 > Still, only one of both files really should be found with this search, so
\r
83 > why is the out put different?
\r
85 If there are multiple copies of a message, I would expect --output=files
\r
86 to show all the copies (files). I believe this is notmuch's way to
\r
87 handle duplicate messages. I think the confusion arises from the notion
\r
88 of treating unique message id, and not unique physical files as the
\r
89 definition of a message. If you think a bit, seems reasonable too.
\r
96 Open source is the future. It sets us free.
\r