1 Return-Path: <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D11B6DE0C1E
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.852,
\r
12 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id rFANH3VgGo8z for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com
\r
20 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B58616DE0350
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by lbcga7 with SMTP id ga7so110534061lbc.1
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:references:in-reply-to
\r
27 :user-agent:message-id:mime-version:content-type
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
29 bh=dYrxokUq8mlf32B+sqc4kOTslY96qHkMZJMhq8SiHaQ=;
\r
30 b=ck8xg1/lWKAorV8tQ2c1oX9HpFV/B1KkdklA8dCcAzNDU4eLRyKlPtBiuvpRly40O0
\r
31 CGnTn8nWzxE4PCeOaq8WrW2iJEsE978huXacMuqLYsUvTxAaZcFW0kDIv3FYbFlXakUQ
\r
32 KveekAY/0SSh/TwJb7T61LIC9bJCAVeS0kOt3yoiewcNZRRfpmXGxf+Uc7Umcr5w3jpj
\r
33 g1XJl5XLeQDqYl7wV4kd4IzFCQCIrzL7BPx6oTft/k462w3kB81ru1xp+R0mQfgYOQYO
\r
34 cChgMgDjrDf6Us2AZ+/jwcZQtAvzHn1ee0RUwVy6e0Funy3+dPT15CIezjhRvqzDUQiV
\r
37 ALoCoQlSozyYuod0qDRwU6bxo0fzVSqJ/zQrncwSfMljWdGtSh54wjvDYjvL/P8Q/LznF9uzbSKm
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.152.8.17 with SMTP id n17mr10935025laa.63.1429432785129;
\r
39 Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Received: from localhost (c7579BF51.dhcp.as2116.net. [81.191.121.117])
\r
41 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ot6sm3546417lbb.39.2015.04.19.01.39.42
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
43 Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:39:38 +0000
\r
45 From: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
\r
46 Subject: Re: [RFC] lib: add support for date:<query>..! to mean
\r
47 date:<query>..<query>
\r
48 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
\r
49 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 References: <1425732959-2282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
51 <87a8y6fuqw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
52 In-Reply-To: <87a8y6fuqw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
53 User-Agent: astroid/vv0.2-30-gd7197a8b (https://github.com/gauteh/astroid)
\r
54 Message-Id: <1429432663-astroid-2-31s581p1zi-1230@strange>
\r
56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
\r
57 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:39:51 -0000
\r
72 Excerpts from Mark Walters's message of April 17, 2015 20:57:
\r
76 > On Sat, 07 Mar 2015, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
79 >> 1) Is something like this useful at all as an intermediate step before
\r
80 >> we can have support for date:<query>? (This can be done with a future
\r
81 >> version of Xapian, or with a custom query query parser.)
\r
83 > This looks good to me. Yes it may not be needed in the future but the
\r
84 > patch is very small. It passes all tests. +1 from me.
\r
86 >> 2) If yes, are there better alternatives to "!" as the end point? (Or
\r
87 >> should the special case be the start point?) Also "@" and "same" have
\r
88 >> been suggested. Examples: date:yesterday..! date:today..@
\r
89 >> date:@..monday date:january..same.
\r
91 > I would be happy with any of these.
\r
93 I am probably missing something, but why do you need the end
\r
96 date:2015-04-16 mean date:2015-04-16..2015-04-16?
\r
97 date:<query> -> date:<query>..<query>
\r