50/ead159db7fb19e9b1de41cd94f624dc0274313

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9241340D174\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Nov 2010 14:33:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -4.19\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
  13         autolearn=unavailable\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id Ak70bG2eOSWi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Tue,  2 Nov 2010 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29F140D179\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Nov 2010 14:33:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-67-243-144-42.nyc.res.rr.com\r
  22         [67.243.144.42])\r
  23         (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
  24         by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA2LXDNA012670\r
  25         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
  26         Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:33:13 -0400 (EDT)\r
  27 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)\r
  28         (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
  29         id 1PDOTg-0002cT-UV; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:33:12 -0400\r
  30 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  31 To: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>,\r
  32         Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  33 Subject: Re: bug report: notmuch-hello 'All tags' view\r
  34 In-Reply-To: <87oca7mo90.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
  35 References: <87pquogrq7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  36         <87lj5bv7sn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
  37         <87r5f3mqdn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
  38         <87oca7mo90.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
  39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
  40         (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  41 Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:33:08 -0400\r
  42 Message-ID: <871v73wgvf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  43 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  44 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  45         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  46 X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
  47 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
  48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  50 Precedence: list\r
  51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  52         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  54         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  60 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:33:31 -0000\r
  61 \r
  62 --=-=-=\r
  63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  64 \r
  65 On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:03:55 +0000, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@ferns=\r
  66 eed.info> wrote:\r
  67 > A call to 'notmuch search-tags' from the command line does indeed return\r
  68 > an empty string as the first entry for me[1].\r
  69 >=20\r
  70 > Does that point to bad data on my part, or has the output of\r
  71 > 'search-tags' changed recently?\r
  72 \r
  73 fwiw, I don't personally get any empty strings in the output of\r
  74 search-tags (with 0.4).  So I don't think it's anything inherent to that\r
  75 function.\r
  76 \r
  77 jamie.\r
  78 \r
  79 --=-=-=\r
  80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  81 \r
  82 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  83 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
  84 \r
  85 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM0IOVAAoJEO00zqvie6q8bz0P+wSkCysWhfyWH/QaOX8+iS6d\r
  86 FTlL+Fy8OuzaOmCR+p6QP7c7CLIjvSbIp7Tv7eX62ixO493dlUtgI52+YEU7q3an\r
  87 BzQrKdvjaXcfmS8Iv2M1p9R3SBMY7UO2VfbnAcREGreJXT8YGPs32k7ud1a91MVq\r
  88 3qxE1fI5K2cnKz9GccY3XEVhGn8g2nBzNmtbwzI1FqGrx0dl+k8dJ2+il1k0i2Vi\r
  89 JDW37Mv1PG4wXM/P2n6Weqq8YC5CNuYGHQZgxgJLJPwN0MaO7zfzyVWXSxl5MHpp\r
  90 zXhVSykZT2+osCfDunoD1ATtM6HTKlB6rbi5ue70VhbhaOIwUbDHEZajAixx1aEz\r
  91 nLIM3g6cO7NjpsJubVC2z99EIuFjO7j9StNA9a2+/oPcjfFTfBgJxAcymEL07N93\r
  92 um01nNKgYuX+B9qqwLwpL/qI2w0eaVwwpRnPvEAMUsNZ3dgJFE3fEAfcXlVwEAXP\r
  93 A8IDybjlbT/DHfaZhC+VmhEleFoxqnqQtcjuWDDs4SXatGsbUywUbTfrM0Khg9n5\r
  94 vJezygpdt9VYdrY4ynSK55GbMHcZgxi88H3kty9Hz1xRjVC4gg7fhsC9QBIXNZJs\r
  95 qyXoVUWatrYCNzbLszByqaNVA74ljiYzhP7l/sr/Vz9m/FQs5ls3yZ2t0CtuQA8L\r
  96 irarWaQ7K5W00MiEf1Xj\r
  97 =S0rr\r
  98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  99 --=-=-=--\r