1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09B3431FC9
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 7rkZB8idniY9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.212.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00AC431FBD
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ex7so810911wid.16
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
26 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
27 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
28 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
29 bh=2hE7SL01KRdDvffgDQ2LIAi0njqDQq3Kdnw2GmqjfA0=;
\r
30 b=dzJqaeKo7V4o/ufBxGdVYmLGIttcFiLBkm8YI7kLWMw5rHcNUEjfxsMjLSLPAwPhHk
\r
31 iIq+XB09UUXqxvq8eg88zjiO+sFNAgu18D1MpMbge/N1/qh+o8VvOqYwxw/4D8yb69Xd
\r
32 OyBHM4q8TYWv0qjnkluIUUSvah/5FjMXb0wbZVN7RmJrI1SrSDG56MAXkXqS3E8A0eC7
\r
33 +dZQZTVXfSnzAaddlqm5L8NQaefmFUrFqlnBfeDkChJs6u/glqYH56f52Z4FsdXj+Bt6
\r
34 ivv3KD6Phu7xzwRBz3jnzOzFG6Wbm7z2Ov8jjZx9BNeV2+lJnV7qDf8G++Fapz+FmDcC
\r
37 ALoCoQlS4Nf+cXVCY6mtwtMJie3FSKshx5lpAhaqeMqCnCWv6d69L9/NX19oUVArHegPznGBvVgn
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.194.100.98 with SMTP id ex2mr3676297wjb.48.1414146220716;
\r
39 Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net
\r
41 ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])
\r
42 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wx3sm5134717wjc.19.2014.10.24.03.23.39
\r
43 for <multiple recipients>
\r
44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
45 Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
46 Received: from localhost (30000@localhost [local]);
\r
47 by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a4323c02;
\r
48 Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:23:38 +0000 (UTC)
\r
49 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,
\r
50 Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] cli: Extend the search command
\r
52 for --output={sender, recipients}
\r
53 In-Reply-To: <87egtzazs8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
54 References: <87zjd51phx.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
55 <1413150093-8383-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
56 <1413150093-8383-4-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
57 <87egtzazs8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
58 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
59 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0)
\r
60 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
61 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:23:38 +0100
\r
62 Message-ID: <m21tpx4vh1.fsf@heart-of-gold.hh.sledj.net>
\r
64 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
65 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
66 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
68 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
69 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
70 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
72 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
73 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
74 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
75 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
76 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
77 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:23:47 -0000
\r
79 On Thu, Oct 23 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
\r
80 > Thinking about this some more how about printing the name and address as
\r
81 > a structured pair/map (at least for all cases except text/text0 output):
\r
82 > something like (in JSON)
\r
83 > [name: "John Doe" address: "john.doe@example.com"]
\r
85 > It seems wrong to me to go to the effort of separating them in the C and
\r
86 > then combining them in the output.
\r
88 Agreed, this would be convenient.
\r