1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E5B431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:37:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.803, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id U8CotKqbkcb0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:37:36 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.148])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BFF431FAE
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:37:36 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 13so298580eye.6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:37:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by 10.213.100.226 with SMTP id z34mr776112ebn.74.1267267050572;
\r
23 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:37:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: from aw.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com
\r
26 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm4521224eyf.35.2010.02.27.02.37.28
\r
27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
28 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:37:29 -0800 (PST)
\r
29 Received: by aw.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id 1BC563A09E; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:37:15 +0000 (GMT)
\r
31 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Mike Kelly <pioto@pioto.org>,
\r
32 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87tyt3u7er.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
34 References: <20100121204201.1C82764A0E@aether.pioto.org>
\r
35 <87tyt3u7er.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
36 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
37 Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:37:14 +0000
\r
38 Message-ID: <87sk8n0xt1.fsf@aw.hh.sledj.net>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 Subject: Re: [notmuch] A few patches
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:37:37 -0000
\r
56 On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:24:44 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
57 > Then, I'd like to have a new, succinct and explicit syntax to indicate a
\r
58 > search that should return all results. For example, we could use '*' but
\r
59 > that has the issue that it would need escaping from the shell. But the
\r
60 > idea would be to be able to run:
\r
64 > to count everything. Anyone have a better option for what the
\r
65 > give-me-everything syntax should be?
\r
69 The search patterns limit the matched messages/folders. An empty pattern
\r
70 should match everything.
\r
74 David Edmondson, http://dme.org
\r