1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9E6431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 02:29:27 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id A91J2a2nN56g for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 3 Feb 2012 02:29:26 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485FA431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 02:29:26 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by bke11 with SMTP id 11so3319774bke.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:29:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=OiZe4tG5llp+uFET8nD+q8QVCVPGNAJzE0shAO8Lijg=;
\r
29 b=E0Leoq2kz9RafoEBFXswEp64oRdZlcpzwaRyfCrlH22ic407HagYrh1Y+uI/n1KNnL
\r
30 8JrtgH4cC2/2eC1O1fNpJRRodwjRzfNC+Of+fgQlM1f9dd8Bq8NwcSqdFefdyKES5Ddk
\r
31 9Tnc1NOen0YlsY3rvqTVMcLN67x6ocJUCBYbg=
\r
32 Received: by 10.204.145.210 with SMTP id e18mr3048407bkv.61.1328264964638;
\r
33 Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:29:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
34 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
\r
35 fg16sm15495723bkb.16.2012.02.03.02.29.23
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:29:23 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: replace occurrences of $PWD with vars that are more
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87ty382p6d.fsf@praet.org>
\r
43 References: <87ipjqb8c1.fsf@praet.org>
\r
44 <1328128641-31155-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
45 <878vkmm9qk.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty382p6d.fsf@praet.org>
\r
46 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+139~gd9b7cab (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
47 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
48 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:09 +0400
\r
49 Message-ID: <87wr84i53a.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
52 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:29:27 -0000
\r
67 On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:20:58 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
68 > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:09:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
70 > > I would prefer to put the whole second argument inside the quotes, not
\r
71 > > just the variable.
\r
75 > I felt the same way initially, but then decided to leave the extra
\r
76 > quotes in place because the resulting fontification helps differentiate
\r
77 > between the vars and actual strings.
\r
80 I still prefer it without quotes.
\r
82 > I assume that was the reason for the extra quotes' presence in the first
\r
83 > place? I might be wrong though...
\r
88 > So with that in mind, do I submit a new patch without the quotes, or leave
\r
92 I would not insist on another patch, taking into account that it was
\r
101 > > > mkdir -p "$(dirname "$external_msg_filename")"
\r
102 > > > mv "$gen_msg_filename" "$external_msg_filename"
\r
103 > > > ln -s "$external_msg_filename" "$gen_msg_filename"
\r