1 Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE21431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id jxM50cFfeHXf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.216.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E313E431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r5so1639326qcx.23
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=dA9xSFd97zCQgj7+ok9+LdA1dzCWOAKonZiAX2S6XPw=;
\r
29 b=e3Vip/UVdKKyas7DmcXwzshjQBBA+n43MHYPdFsRbuNE4TUv/M3L6/iTrZFNbsgxGF
\r
30 VE7tL/Bfzvpt0vSygBoRe3n0fT9MpF1F54ixanhkumGMdW/eq8eusJ9EYFccEdqZGveE
\r
31 HVk9TgPb4bkf/t420XBHUe0NLNmv5hnvFsmKljZGH+DNH283XoPsHos6P6ivCR6pEcah
\r
32 sk8SIHyg3bx9uqKJmEOyrEbE0NpR4gBmnkNrvty9j9PTOL/FqzyPXkPJ1cjQ9yio7w5O
\r
33 /Za4oJ8YCQh5zTVI8aueI4cRzZG8/3rPn00hKNT8MhN9eYE+HIqsJHR7nYo0jjQ6x6Ev
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.49.98.100 with SMTP id eh4mr2342238qeb.42.1381406475718;
\r
36 Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (pool-108-8-224-250.spfdma.east.verizon.net.
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm97606356qai.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00
\r
40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
41 Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
\r
42 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
43 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch compact support (v4)
\r
45 In-Reply-To: <8738o9whku.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
46 References: <1380745848-4972-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
47 <8738o9whku.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+107~g1ef2773 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
\r
49 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
50 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:01:13 -0400
\r
51 Message-ID: <87r4btfi7q.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
53 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
54 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:01:22 -0000
\r
70 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
71 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
73 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
75 > Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> writes:
\r
77 >> Here is yet another iteration of my "notmuch compact" patchset. It has b=
\r
79 >> rebased on top of master and the interface reworked as suggested by Jani.
\r
82 > Sorry, first version of this reply didn't go to the list.
\r
84 > I haven't had time to do a review, but I did try them out, and they
\r
85 > seemed not to eat my database.
\r
87 > What about a test for the test suite?=20
\r
89 I'll implement something along these lines and send a patch shortly.
\r
96 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
98 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
99 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
\r
101 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSVpcJAAoJEErkyLZmeNiD4DsIAJnJCVnYjmsvf0AS9iBn/G8f
\r
102 K+v68wwWQNgnouPbqazpN3ODUzO/vuud8AQQJPLNNiyJuVcQMalV3pNIBdCM3bP6
\r
103 8pOrhKTJs8b9NJFrrAMr/iyFsAVJRoKlTdZmsdch6PvZAVe3IGmjJQgkQC2mnpG6
\r
104 z3LH5bQ/7yaWK9Hf0XhVv9iXzwel5fAx6Fka4wdEAd+claZScs7/OHXDAwaBAaSR
\r
105 0axASlDYT8BIr8kJLGUDB+qfvLKot/q1zc0QGfiurFCbhwkgFU2iVxQuVQhvQauZ
\r
106 KQZEhT2OZEzXrb05ZYos9NE97jKcuQu/Gbc8YlqVwTSvsMZFde5rQc4RA5jL0rs=
\r
108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r