47/6baacfa5d44e88d4ccbc1b0935477878385635

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1982C431FAF\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id fcOXkJds8qG9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F96431FAE\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so5828462pbb.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type\r
  27         :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
  28         bh=Q7tczjLxBckf76MVU0+B+gDS6bjBQARQyp1lA74eqjc=;\r
  29         b=W6M25YHu2zwrgoqeb3bo7z6TFlD9V0tc2mHrIvFu1ueOFCVXbysnvsXLUgK9VK4jtR\r
  30         DieC/nRzuEXpZVmm+Ib0Tdcf86MMykb0RIk0Jgym/kKpM57NTvEqQ25Uwz+iKP4y2SON\r
  31         XC3VxKGk+Ji+n1aHfo6D7ORb6mjKZWJeaYJBGn/3PbNcUrOdJ229QY1y96uG3vk4rQAS\r
  32         sH+F0eEUegOKV1G4YbGyX/p8/EXVU6xda152MB8ZWgrjkpTHVV78dg5TkUybJbs1WR/l\r
  33         UJXOlvkCqSXxbSyuR6bOTOIYy/SZ3Qdqw3qLCUESpaIVzDSr+G5b6ewUSF3+rgfmPY7s\r
  34         covw==\r
  35 Received: by 10.68.194.105 with SMTP id hv9mr27963603pbc.126.1338213618827;\r
  36         Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
  37 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  38         [220.233.42.215])\r
  39         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pb3sm10695515pbc.6.2012.05.28.07.00.16\r
  40         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
  41         Mon, 28 May 2012 07:00:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
  42 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:12 +1000\r
  43 Message-ID: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain>\r
  44 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  45 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 Subject: search summary and exclusions\r
  47 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  49 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  50 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  53 Precedence: list\r
  54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  63 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:00:20 -0000\r
  64 \r
  65 Hi,\r
  66 \r
  67 Exclusions don't work the way I expected with the search command and\r
  68 --output=summary.  I would like messages with excluded tags to be\r
  69 treated as if they don't exist at all, but currently:\r
  70 \r
  71   * excluded messages are counted towards the "total"\r
  72   * excluded tags are included in the "tags" set\r
  73 \r
  74 Are these deliberate?  Especially the second point seems to conflict\r
  75 with search --output=tags, which doesn't show excluded tags.\r
  76 \r
  77 Peter\r