1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9902431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id yVoFaFnAe5oI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71BD431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ex7so4348815wid.13
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
27 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=1OJsguNGqls2JFvwpeF0cY+5TFIZyuKfwCGFsgQI7sQ=;
\r
29 b=N49sxrx19nBm/BFHON9cM/DpJ5OCNcOFHv+CjFwQJkkO6BaODQWP+bGVgb3PgKIvcv
\r
30 KYzR8HcP6VtYG2KnDQMYyD1sF0BAU4d7X3+XVTgK8i2e4FeIk+8rSsxklXQ4fhPw+Lfh
\r
31 gFtQNB6c4OUZQjaVanmkjOzNKC14pDdRc3R6Zm5eUbIN7Ir/PLpWOv4GnW1S+WWn8lCT
\r
32 c+TdenjX4tbgPDro+n4mJgEqSPCpLh8TpYnEZ/7Xi4bMlS+TA9zcphXNi/4AbzjbCHXJ
\r
33 r+cLfZWlcZQZV5UWBucP3W17RrLf9fGjT3KWU9wtT80EUM2XzgmVwsasjFejWjC/VIuR
\r
36 ALoCoQmvdlvay6fbuI+GrwgbAZaFUlSVBRGR9cCRpkZZAhz4SJpkCq+J9l2kynTtH4C9X7MJghN0
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.180.211.76 with SMTP id na12mr23649849wic.57.1410791188635;
\r
38 Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:f00a:9c2f:b998:3319])
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm14969943wjy.22.2014.09.15.07.26.27
\r
41 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
43 Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
\r
45 Subject: Re: multiple machine tagging
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <20140915141410.GA31881@odin.tremily.us>
\r
47 References: <87vdaj2d4p.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
\r
48 <m2bnqhkn8j.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>
\r
49 <20140915141410.GA31881@odin.tremily.us>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
51 (x86_64-apple-darwin)
\r
52 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
53 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:26:26 +0100
\r
54 Message-ID: <m28ullklil.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>
\r
56 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
57 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:26:35 -0000
\r
72 On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
\r
73 > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
\r
74 >> On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
\r
75 >> (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
\r
77 >> > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
\r
80 >> > In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered
\r
81 >> > identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is mostly fine
\r
82 >> > - it can just happen on each of the machines. Any hand-added tags are
\r
83 >> > a problem, though.
\r
85 >> Is there any significant change to this picture?
\r
87 > Does nmbug not do this for you? This is exactly what it was designed
\r
88 > to do (sync tags).
\r
90 Perhaps. Is anyone using it for personal tag sync?
\r