1 Return-Path: <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853CE6DE1479
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:59:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.458 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.262,
\r
12 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01]
\r
14 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id xIFzJF8a-A7Y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:59:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235])
\r
19 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9E86DE141E
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:59:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: from webmail04.plus.net ([84.93.228.66]) by avasout07 with smtp
\r
22 id Qdz91s0031SbfYc01dzAns; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:59:10 +0000
\r
24 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=QqujpgGd c=1 sm=1 tr=0
\r
25 a=C5+YawzV8SR07mwocaP9vA==:117 a=G4bc5lkgapKKm1P+Twxy3Q==:17
\r
26 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10
\r
27 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=GmsYLbB6KjDZExrHqMUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
\r
28 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.plus.net)
\r
29 by webmail04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
\r
30 (envelope-from <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>)
\r
31 id 1aakpQ-0003hD-Sz; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:59:09 +0000
\r
32 Received: from 80.229.236.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bubblegen+matt)
\r
33 by webmail.plus.net with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:59:09 -0000
\r
34 Message-ID: <c4ff9f2c141441be10b1cb4b1e0300a7.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <m2a8miwc6x.fsf@dme.org>
\r
36 References: <f50e07855e9bbbdd780ef925d8e2d879.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>
\r
37 <m2a8miwc6x.fsf@dme.org>
\r
38 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:59:09 -0000
\r
39 Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html
\r
40 From: "Matthew Lear" <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
41 To: "David Edmondson" <dme@dme.org>
\r
42 Cc: matt@bubblegen.co.uk,
\r
43 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 Reply-To: matt@bubblegen.co.uk
\r
45 User-Agent: SquirrelMail
\r
47 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
\r
48 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
\r
49 X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:59:14 -0000
\r
65 > There is probably a bug here.
\r
67 > On Tue, Mar 01 2016, Matthew Lear wrote:
\r
68 >> Notmuch shows this as:
\r
70 >> [ multipart/encrypted ]
\r
71 >> [ Decryption successful ]
\r
72 >> [ Good signature by: xxxx ]
\r
73 >> [ application/pgp-encrypted ]
\r
75 >> [ multipart/mixed ]
\r
76 >> [ multipart/alternative ]
\r
77 >> [ text/plain (hidden) ]
\r
78 >> [ multipart/related ]
\r
79 >> [ text/html (hidden) ]
\r
80 >> [ image.jpg: image/jpeg (hidden) ]
\r
82 > You're saying here that you don't get shown the text/html part?
\r
84 Apologies. No, I do get shown the text/html part. I just collapsed all the
\r
85 parts here for illustration purposes.
\r
87 >> (setq notmuch-multipart/alternative-discouraged '("text/plain"
\r
88 >> "multipart/related"))
\r
90 > I'm curious to understand why you discourage multipart/related. That's
\r
91 > almost always used to wrap a text/html part with an image/jpg that the
\r
92 > text/html part refers to by cid:.
\r
94 Fair point. I think I had this discouraged as a hangover from having to
\r
95 deal with malformatted PGP encrypted emails. I don't receive emails from
\r
96 people which have been encrypted with that sw any more so I should
\r
97 probably remove it. Even with multipart/related discouraged though, I
\r
98 don't have any problem with embedded images / cid etc. All displayed ok.
\r
100 > Are things different if you discourage only text/plain?
\r