1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43362431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id xYOWahcOGmwn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.217.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33AF431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v1so535641lbd.11
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
\r
27 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
\r
28 bh=dHKMVmW3OZ6zyCdScxVhOVdTAbca2fDRP/x5tY4bzdA=;
\r
29 b=YwXHlKBxAQgoG1BqD+MsuvB0ADhK5Pew6X4Roxq1maxJ0KfxggBecvsftHII1M+wPe
\r
30 nPnxAr0gVLak8TVNE35l7hJhrptojwCcW2gfHYoMXVLpv/enIa60FUvg+bNlN3XSRODZ
\r
31 sOakOAmF1DkBo2vDJ8p0InDU1hHSgfbDQ/GNbI2L46EarkpYN+q4g+r9Kf6Yj72oGpt1
\r
32 juH9c5SF1camth1CN5JJrD9q6AJMCGtDjJCk4RP79L3Y8KxL4k1It2eV+EnW6mGHtqax
\r
33 t1hMzrwc37WQM1LfkyP+mthZ8jdcEhSN/t6b8Rzz1zSEFj+rjONQJzoBCQdqLEHQWoVU
\r
36 X-Received: by 10.152.19.10 with SMTP id a10mr26865954lae.8.1367213652344;
\r
37 Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 In-Reply-To: <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
40 References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
41 <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
42 <CAMP44s07KeL4uAChs3KFiqwcsCwWTvni6MzFGzXNeO7=sd6U6Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
43 <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
44 <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
45 <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
46 <CAMP44s3x0m-KUN6aND71SHbBWz6S_23ZcQ-mcT+qxVtEdU+-5w@mail.gmail.com>
\r
47 <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
48 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:34:12 -0500
\r
50 <CAMP44s3Qyc4mNx=MotX5vUKo-xpj0fj9Qmcoidpe3AKjbjV9_Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
51 Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings
\r
52 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
53 To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
55 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 05:34:16 -0000
\r
70 On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 8:22 PM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:
\r
71 > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
\r
73 >> I understand that you are not going to work on the Debian packages for
\r
74 >> some time, but what prevents this patch from being merged to notmuch
\r
75 >> 'master'? Is there any problems with the patch? Shall I just push it?
\r
77 > The Debian packaging in master is the `live' packaging that generates
\r
78 > the packages that are uploaded to Debian. So effectively you are asking
\r
79 > me "Are you willing to upload this package to Debian". I'm not sure
\r
80 > about that yet. Don't take it personally, there are currently 71
\r
81 > patches in the review queue. More reviews are always welcome ;).
\r
83 I don't take it personally, I just don't see why a part of the project
\r
84 has to be treated differently because you (the debian packager), don't
\r
85 want to setup a separate git repo where to have this 'live' packaging
\r
86 (or even a separate branch).
\r