1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B772431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 23:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id z-jkgG6E8qnn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 26 May 2013 23:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00348431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 23:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1UgqhO-0001M3-78; Mon, 27 May 2013 07:14:31 +0100
\r
27 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)
\r
28 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)
\r
29 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
30 id 1UgqhN-00058K-Uw; Mon, 27 May 2013 07:14:26 +0100
\r
31 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
32 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
\r
33 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] man: document notmuch count --output=files
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <878v31l0mq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
36 References: <cover.1368467532.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
37 <f17c2b077aa75783444706e8de731a270fd6ba9c.1368467532.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
38 <878v31l0mq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+255~gff3cc55 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
41 Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 07:14:24 +0100
\r
42 Message-ID: <87bo7xj6f3.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31
\r
46 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
47 X-QM-Body-MD5: e2ff07298de97c913479003f39938cbd (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
48 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.1
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: /
\r
50 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
52 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
53 This message scored -0.1 points.
\r
54 Summary of the scoring:
\r
55 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
56 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
57 * -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
58 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 06:14:48 -0000
\r
74 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
76 > Other than the bikeshed about starting from zero instead of one, and not
\r
77 > being completely happy with the option name --duplicate (but not being
\r
78 > inspired to suggest a better one), this series looks OK to me.
\r
80 > It seems like it would be quite useful to query based on the number of
\r
81 > duplicates, but that is a much more ambitious task, I think.
\r
83 This series basically looks good to me too. I agree with all of the
\r
84 above points though.
\r