35/829f9700166306c2b661b1eae303f31029d22d

   1 Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B724196F2\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.1\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
  13         DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]\r
  14         autolearn=ham\r
  15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  17         with ESMTP id 2N6LQCMUWS37 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  18         Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
  19 Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com\r
  20         [209.85.160.53])\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D766E431FC1\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:37 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so6269702pwj.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date\r
  27         :message-id:x-mailer;\r
  28         bh=70KdpgPiiniWs5V9y6pwOfpCrGG3z692fqwYXmR7tmw=;\r
  29         b=cGg4EslAwTyUwdiB15MpZ7YInJsarYbdWjkZnGVLB79sHs/96u6/eDiQ4/N5Z7dNB9\r
  30         QZhd+rMptfc/YGvbE+oNNI0+yRrj2RjrRxCjFN5hc6D8uDSeT7/DzjD/2VmfsqINTnyC\r
  31         CXnaQmjFxgxuZttSX/TpDW+v+KTSiONYE9hUo=\r
  32 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  33         h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer;\r
  34         b=s6y2/pnrxafL9OQp2LtAaFbLVQIM7ZW4L7Zm0U7QLJ4MNg7V+1mhZdziyJEnl/NggK\r
  35         9NdyXKODR1ukAQt5oOG3TNcpYOY8AF2Oay33q9VoOdyftM0PgIoFOfUk1QJ9ZiY5n2NB\r
  36         Fheq8tjpXBX7QNPay2fO9HhMDYmSsNpDqXY3g=\r
  37 Received: by 10.143.20.30 with SMTP id x30mr5070899wfi.57.1271974836164;\r
  38         Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
  39 Received: from localhost.localdomain (physnat56.physics.umass.edu\r
  40         [128.119.50.56])\r
  41         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v41sm182194wfh.21.2010.04.22.15.20.34\r
  42         (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
  43 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
  44 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  45 Subject: Recent linker errors for notmuch-shared\r
  46 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:20:26 -0400\r
  47 Message-Id: <1271974827-10978-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
  48 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.5\r
  49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  51 Precedence: list\r
  52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  53         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  55         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  61 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:20:38 -0000\r
  62 \r
  63 Hey all,\r
  64 \r
  65 When I pulled a few days ago I noticed that notmuch-shared failed to link due\r
  66 to missing LDFLAGS. In particular, it seems that the linker flags don't include\r
  67 CONFIGURE_LDFLAGS, meaning that all of the required external shared libraries\r
  68 depedencies aren't linked against. Here is a patch to fix this. It works for\r
  69 me, although perhaps this isn't what others envision. Thanks!\r
  70 \r
  71 - Ben\r