1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3B0431FAE;
\r
6 Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:56:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id pooGNZFLFehL; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
11 Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
12 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED60431FC3;
\r
13 Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
14 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
15 To: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
16 In-Reply-To: <877htavdn1.fsf@59A2.org>
\r
17 References: <877htavdn1.fsf@59A2.org>
\r
18 Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:43 -0800
\r
19 Message-ID: <87vdgupm8w.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
21 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
22 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
23 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Mailing list Reply-To munging and notmuch reply
\r
24 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
25 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
27 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
28 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
29 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
30 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
31 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
32 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
33 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
34 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
35 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
36 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:56:00 -0000
\r
39 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
41 On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:05:06 +0100, Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org> wrote:
\r
42 > First, I'm aware that such munging is A Bad Thing
\r
44 > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
\r
48 > From: Some User <some.user@example.com>
\r
49 > To: Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>
\r
50 > Reply-To: Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>
\r
52 > Notmuch reply produces
\r
54 > To: Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>,
\r
55 > Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>
\r
57 > Handling this is a bit messy, I think we want the current behavior
\r
58 > unless To matches Reply-To, in which case we use From and Reply-To. If
\r
59 > this is indeed the least bad behavior, I will make a patch for it.
\r
61 Oh, I really like that. The condition there avoids breaking legitimate
\r
62 uses of Reply-To, (such as the cairo lists I run, where cairo-commit@
\r
63 has no user-generated From:---just a single automated address, but has
\r
64 Reply-To: set to the cairo@ list instead so that replies to committed
\r
65 patches go to the right place).
\r
70 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
72 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
73 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
75 iD8DBQFLEWQf6JDdNq8qSWgRAv+BAKCS3A0yOVFWDZol5SWdMPr4yHv4LwCgoE6Z
\r
76 xsrJOhWt/KbpsgyTl3czejA=
\r
78 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r