Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in Message.maildir_flags_to_tags
[notmuch-archives.git] / 30 / 901b678ed5e9984a0284d4d16f8618824ed40e
1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E96F431FAF\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:16:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id t5F5HKQ6BcOp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com\r
19         [209.85.217.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979B7431FAE\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t10so8422601lbi.4\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
26         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
27         :cc:content-type;\r
28         bh=O88B8zjw+Csku6i8ggQu4GRM5Nb4ZPwk8fiI7N0ZtVc=;\r
29         b=X/pNvppFYlfbj5qva2pPW6/4NhkYGWXhHjWNAEl4d2AaNNhJQ0Obj552i9B8w98ScB\r
30         v6/haamP+CXL4iH8HfSQlJygDa2C1t0PeS6hJjZFoOl8Y7AtLwUlN5fQpi9QYZF2Dg9E\r
31         bMiKLtR+c2FdmoTH06YYyn28y8t0mUJQGj+2pgONu2wtFkElbdVLScKBRxx0OIEKZp8c\r
32         3KWQiTlZnTjWAo2DVnb/6IHlF6l+EcpNqTuzsQYW9v66yHAeK8OQ0DjgN24yG3doby0M\r
33         6xPvucKKsSl3wbSG82lIRC35TV6TnA+z4QYwG1MMFlMqJPdkzWvIjFkso/j1J5DNbHZm\r
34         G1+g==\r
35 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
36 X-Received: by 10.112.156.164 with SMTP id wf4mr569113lbb.76.1369797356042;\r
37         Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
38 Received: by 10.114.177.164 with HTTP; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:55 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 In-Reply-To: <87ehcvteo6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
40 References: <1367142758-26120-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
41         <CAMP44s0fCD+ndyDnR_5BQ4Oppkdj4KoKbf5MBqJ6V6r_668Thw@mail.gmail.com>\r
42         <87ehcvteo6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
43 Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:55 -0500\r
44 Message-ID:\r
45  <CAMP44s09XQ4dqk-Lokve8Dn6iKGk_k2ghcz-FjNxe-QYSmxzwQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
46 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates\r
47 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
48 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
50 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
53 Precedence: list\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 03:16:05 -0000\r
64 \r
65 On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:41 AM, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
66 \r
67 > At this point we wait for somebody (else) with Fedora expertise to\r
68 > review the patches.\r
69 \r
70 Like who? I though the reason these were never updated is that there\r
71 wasn't anybody else.\r
72 \r
73 -- \r
74 Felipe Contreras\r