Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] index encrypted parts when asked.
[notmuch-archives.git] / 2e / a89dcab896edc2026dfcf7908851b62bb230b2
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230EA431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 Apr 2012 00:55:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id OXh9a1XWOzPH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Wed,  4 Apr 2012 00:55:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
18         [131.215.239.19])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793F7431FAE\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 Apr 2012 00:55:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C19E66E0180;\r
23         Wed,  4 Apr 2012 00:55:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65])\r
26         (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
27         by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF6766E018D;\r
28         Wed,  4 Apr 2012 00:55:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
30         id CBF883BC; Wed,  4 Apr 2012 00:55:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
32 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] cli: add support for batch tagging operations to\r
34         "notmuch tag"\r
35 In-Reply-To: <87bon82qok.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
36 References: <cover.1333231401.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
37         <f360a40bed50208d146aee8b06946b1b8315e818.1333231401.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
38         <87ty123tpc.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
39         <87aa2tc22z.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
40         <87iphh50hz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
41         <CAB+hUn_J9oOmbWaQ+_2yGG6i6ecDXbfJWYbpaYx_kbSnAH+EcA@mail.gmail.com>\r
42         <87fwcl4yr8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
43         <CAB+hUn-5yB15na2kFMZOjOEujKQTWHiefvgQYsT4Zi3UOzKwQw@mail.gmail.com>\r
44         <87d37p4xor.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
45         <87pqbpxm2c.fsf@nikula.org>\r
46         <87wr5w2zv5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
47         <87bon82qok.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+87~g3c4c85f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
49         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
50 Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:55:11 -0700\r
51 Message-ID: <87aa2s2aow.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
53 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
54         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
55 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
58 Precedence: list\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:55:24 -0000\r
69 \r
70 --=-=-=\r
71 \r
72 On Tue, Apr 03 2012, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
73 > My thinking was that it was useful for the disk format to have a bit\r
74 > more information in it so that we could more easily change the interface\r
75 > in an upwardly compatible way. If at some point in the future we do have\r
76 > more general batch command processing, it would be nice not have to\r
77 > change the file format again, particularly for dump files.\r
78 \r
79 I concede that it's possible to move forward with this idea in a way\r
80 that satisfies an immediate need while still being flexible going\r
81 forward.\r
82 \r
83 With that in mind, I think I stand by my suggestion that the form should\r
84 match exactly the notmuch subcommand format.  Even considering the\r
85 technical issues that Jani brought up, I still think it makes the most\r
86 sense to imagine generic batch processing handled by the top level\r
87 binary.  And in that case the most logical format for the input is\r
88 probably just that of the CLI arguments.\r
89 \r
90 Just out of curiosity and for the sake of argument, if we were going to\r
91 design a server/batch processor from the ground up would it make sense\r
92 to use a format like this, or would we better off opting for some other\r
93 more established protocol?\r
94 \r
95 jamie.\r
96 \r
97 --=-=-=\r
98 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
99 \r
100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
101 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
102 \r
103 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPe/5fAAoJEO00zqvie6q8ZbMP/AkqqaxFBSB/ToWoyGkwMUFC\r
104 lPFeurEjR+5Dxqp3TWPAl05z9nDbOxuOF4Y4TDfzBf6CzTasVN5CYh3ng1vbMXWp\r
105 YXRqW7p9PSqwemHxATcoURtzwt9iTytH84tY1S4h61baDalqUBNvfVAH5XkJ4Ouy\r
106 iha8NGbt2QQQHblcGe4+7Bezun8/U0BpggwrtKARIaoHXp/TGG6NToWCrQ8p6nHk\r
107 +uh124noKHEZeY99MI9rNxV7tiVTwoIbokm7b+xp7K0cYMySwEyQ6Q/vMDtnoVdC\r
108 2X5foxZbXJjnJRjp+wrZOyOXtsAqR2HS12c/pQaHiZCtPW9xDkVeMVqtAmUDs9tX\r
109 KADVH/2pginq3nZAJ8AbLZtMYGWMyRptJC1zPaoouTeLVrQCtu50rSisQaVLn/97\r
110 Vzsuix8HEvyuN1MUmw/2uuTLf7sTBQlrE8q5n3GR5XFMLWQvPqD7LiBsHhR7V6AA\r
111 NSyW47WYqPCGF7t6jqddloMopIBk8X3l9PgWqQdMu9dqcUwmy94IZ/zjlBhNApty\r
112 Yq4fPahGo1J+3eLT9ZNQFUbiqcNMkoQPcq8W6D88cIU+qdN06DuaYFREAm6F6aAT\r
113 n3cWhzY4IMoLTmylroffoVXeetE3tOta9SPO8aJjL96Zk1nzgpAF6Yif7KDY3k/a\r
114 wn5bD3C+JYSRnkN+82di\r
115 =pvDZ\r
116 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
117 --=-=-=--\r