1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF18C429E21
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id rezCMd7MYP8r for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07860431FB6
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by bkbzt12 with SMTP id zt12so6204578bkb.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=Ld52j8T95rTvTKRDqNCVqM89gdPp/w2WgBEsQKR0qzo=;
\r
29 b=GjayXFSNirgCv3Hp7Ebl7+w/dalE7NJ6ru8RPdxDjXW0leeSdBZN6tocgJf5XyZEQV
\r
30 VJWHEkHcL5/8PKcPdkt+/nblNJYTY7WVtJ2zuwC9KDXiAw1XgLRPPLvF+2xDZZeNIu27
\r
31 11AG+3Fr0nwyf+j59RZTpK3GLj4KqRNxFnNJ4=
\r
32 Received: by 10.204.156.135 with SMTP id x7mr4183871bkw.258.1317649131003;
\r
33 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
34 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v16sm13255535bkd.6.2011.10.03.06.38.48
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] test: add emacs test for hiding a message following
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <8739fackqf.fsf@thor.loria.fr>
\r
43 References: <1309744743-8556-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
44 <1309744743-8556-3-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
45 <87zkhrlg8z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <874nzz2p3f.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
46 <87d3ehylon.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87hb3s414e.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
47 <8739fackqf.fsf@thor.loria.fr>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.8-50-gd528fd9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
49 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
50 Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:38:44 +0400
\r
51 Message-ID: <8762k642l7.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
54 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:38:56 -0000
\r
71 On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:39:36 +0200, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:
\r
72 > On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:45:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
73 > > BTW there were patches to support tmux (or maybe it was dtach). IIRC
\r
74 > > the consensus was that supporting it does not worth complicating test
\r
75 > > lib. I think this can be reconsidered if it turns out that many users
\r
76 > > do not have screen, but do have tmux. But you never know if the
\r
77 > > patches are not applied. They have been around for several months, I
\r
78 > > doubt you would suddenly get feedback now.
\r
80 > I'm the one that wrote the tmux patch (and suggested dtach), and yes in
\r
81 > the end the consensus was that it wasn't worth it.
\r
83 > About adding prereqs to the test suite -- in my private branch I have a
\r
84 > rebased and fixed version of the patch series sent by Pieter Praet [1].
\r
85 > It worked fine last time I tested it on a system without screen and in a
\r
86 > chroot without emacs/gpg/screen, so if anyone is interested I can post
\r
87 > it here. (Cc'ing Pieter)
\r
90 Cool. You have Pieter's series plus a patch for screen, right?
\r
92 Please post it, I am interested :)
\r
97 > [1] id:"1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r