2e/08fe1fe6098c6bf85fcb4c6db3be091a89c677

   1 Return-Path: <amdragon@mit.edu>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52301429E2E\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:56:35 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id r1VumyNZJ8AM for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:56:34 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-5.MIT.EDU\r
  18         [18.7.68.34])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91192431FB6\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:56:34 -0800 (PST)\r
  21 X-AuditID: 12074422-b7ff56d00000092f-94-4ecc60e23e39\r
  22 Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39])\r
  23         by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP\r
  24         id 08.ED.02351.2E06CCE4; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:56:34 -0500 (EST)\r
  25 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])\r
  26         by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id pAN2uXxT030687; \r
  27         Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:56:33 -0500\r
  28 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91])\r
  29         (authenticated bits=0)\r
  30         (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)\r
  31         by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id pAN2uWGH004151\r
  32         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
  33         Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:56:33 -0500 (EST)\r
  34 Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77)\r
  35         (envelope-from <amdragon@mit.edu>)\r
  36         id 1RT32z-0006tB-76; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:58:53 -0500\r
  37 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:58:53 -0500\r
  38 From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
  39 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
  40 Subject: Re: Incorrect parsing of email addresses (MIME with quotes)\r
  41 Message-ID: <20111123025852.GJ9351@mit.edu>\r
  42 References: <2flr522zju3.fsf@login2.uio.no>\r
  43         <4EA58DC6.6090108@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  44         <2fl1ut17iqm.fsf@diskless.uio.no> <87y5v7spk5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  45 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  47 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  48 In-Reply-To: <87y5v7spk5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  49 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
  50 X-Brightmail-Tracker:\r
  51  H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT132UcMbP4NgBVosbrd2MFtdvzmS2\r
  52         2Hl1AqMDs0fn0r2sHs9W3WL22HLoPXMAcxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxvOXKxgLpnNWtPRvYm5g\r
  53         3MbexcjJISFgInHo5GtmCFtM4sK99WxdjFwcQgL7GCWmTprFDuFsYJS4ueg5VOYkk8TbF9+g\r
  54         MksYJZa+6wObxSKgKrFz12NGEJtNQENi2/7lYLYIUPzqtslsIDazgJPE2j+drCC2sICLxJev\r
  55         7SwgNq+AtsTVry+YIIbOZJQ4N2E5M0RCUOLkzCcsEM1aEjf+vQQq4gCypSWW/+MACXMK6Ers\r
  56         nNvPBGKLCqhITDm5jW0Co9AsJN2zkHTPQuhewMi8ilE2JbdKNzcxM6c4NVm3ODkxLy+1SNdU\r
  57         LzezRC81pXQTIzjcXZR2MP48qHSIUYCDUYmHN+rkaT8h1sSy4srcQ4ySHExKory748/4CfEl\r
  58         5adUZiQWZ8QXleakFh9ilOBgVhLhveYOlONNSaysSi3Kh0lJc7AoifNy7XTwExJITyxJzU5N\r
  59         LUgtgsnKcHAoSfBOBRkqWJSanlqRlplTgpBm4uAEGc4DNLwOpIa3uCAxtzgzHSJ/ilFRSpx3\r
  60         M0hCACSRUZoH1wtLR68YxYFeEeZtBqniAaYyuO5XQIOZgAZPW3sCZHBJIkJKqoHRYe+CUv8b\r
  61         y2LqF7DwXHf+lS6zaQdXSu80dXWlOO8Hh+RLRB40Cyxh81WV8mrkNu3++0Rb0ON4Z7ee9fM4\r
  62         Kx+5DWeyPtuuucXv1++/8v2mCRvsU5WDOwVUtgvyByZtajmVG9D7I06vTuTkPO1Vouxbvts1\r
  63         nfQ2/VPoeFUs6tG5lgn+63207yuxFGckGmoxFxUnAgDHbip4IgMAAA==\r
  64 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>\r
  65 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  66 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  67 Precedence: list\r
  68 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  69         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  70 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  71         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  72 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  73 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  74 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  75 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  76         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  77 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 02:56:35 -0000\r
  78 \r
  79 Quoth David Bremner on Nov 22 at  7:30 pm:\r
  80 > On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:38:57 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> wrote:\r
  81 > > I just hope the notmuch developers can choose to follow the robustness\r
  82 > > principle[1] in this case, and be liberal in what notmuch accept, and\r
  83 > > conservative in what notmuch send.  After all, gnus, mutt and pine\r
  84 > > handle these from fields.\r
  85 > \r
  86 > It's a nice stick to beat people with, but I'm not sure it's directly\r
  87 > applicable here. Notmuch is accepting the input, it just isn't\r
  88 > displaying it the way you want. I guess if somebody has some patches for\r
  89 > "sloppy header parsing", we can weigh the pros and cons then.\r
  90 > \r
  91 > If someone wants to follow up on this, we are currently using\r
  92 > \r
  93 > http://spruce.sourceforge.net/gmime/doc/gmime-gmime-utils.html#g-mime-utils-header-decode-text\r
  94 > \r
  95 > There is some discussion there about dealing with bad inputs; I don't\r
  96 > know if it is directly relevant.\r
  97 \r
  98 Based on\r
  99   http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mime.gmime.devel/65\r
 100 I thought gmime was supposed to be dealing with broken RFC 2047\r
 101 encoding now.  Am I misinterpreting it?  Maybe a bug needs to be filed\r
 102 against gmime?\r