1 Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12D7431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id vvmFtPiBzYDP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B3F431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so4315287lah.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
\r
27 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
\r
29 bh=K5JwiV58mTDQE9EpDdB5BJ6vVXrx7RlOSvf80rG5d7U=;
\r
30 b=duIUgU3zkhJ+MMYzFq+/GiokBXyCpjj8Hmj0rl+HDEJcVGc6Sx/jwa+niTwxdF6JMu
\r
31 8fbyAZKTwVKVH8jR6XatGZGV2TolK5Io6A5+Yg+VMgdqzMsfSfXZJuqHisXxRD/TsVwx
\r
32 j7iESy7io3HA/z1ipWTnKRtMBpjN/hyjWYa2B2D0bMuMgHoqqTOaUdCNDxhGoJiO2xFS
\r
33 nZFDmknPQQSUtoWrAf6WqwD2qZgHJx/ZgoeV6K16VMKHthmPxQrWzUVcWig/2oLpOxtf
\r
34 Q8yE7VI9SHZviJoUippdOnMITx85o174JZcrAWQy7LBHvyL7f044NRKxzAU/TcUP00aI
\r
37 Received: by 10.112.99.7 with SMTP id em7mr2494345lbb.81.1332012790410; Sat,
\r
38 17 Mar 2012 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Received: by 10.112.20.163 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <8762e3dosb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
43 References: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
44 <8762e3dosb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
45 Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:33:10 -0600
\r
46 X-Google-Sender-Auth: shy31AXdEzM_gV88ZxiYYY0k-s4
\r
48 <CAMoJFUs1PCS1adiB-H2=H0oCsk-c8-_5Oagqc27_TgnUH-cVBw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
49 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Reply enhancements
\r
50 From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
51 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
53 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
55 ALoCoQmRI22A2M5fTgypqDwV46Epf7CD0tNNk65pZ6yD+wo9P0BclhR0SQgODTgGR0eyCnVOVcMr
\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:33:15 -0000
\r
71 On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 13:13, Jameson Graef Rollins
\r
72 <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
73 > The test suite actually includes a test for replying to encrypted
\r
74 > messages (see crypto: "reply to encrypted message"). =A0That test should
\r
75 > run as long as gnupg is available on the test system, and if it passes
\r
76 > you should be good to go.
\r
78 > But in any event I have tested this patch set, including the decryption
\r
79 > option, and it all looks good to me.
\r
83 The crypto test suite has never worked for me, even though I have
\r
84 gnupg installed. I assume it's some sort of configuration issue on my
\r
85 system, but I haven't been able to figure out what it is.
\r