Re: Applying patches directly from emails?
[notmuch-archives.git] / 28 / eae87e6c61d344c302c39c7129f517af81b028
1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226AC431FC0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:21:01 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
10         with ESMTP id 8hQCGYSl0zQr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
11         Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:21:00 -0800 (PST)\r
12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
13         [209.85.218.224])\r
14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FE7431FAE\r
15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:21:00 -0800 (PST)\r
16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so3415853bwz.30\r
17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:20:59 -0800 (PST)\r
18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject\r
20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
21         bh=Ajw5OlxfAtK48TPvujIKeF84i64TlaOyQAYP7z/Ub7Y=;\r
22         b=vXISagHjBI8paBMjxVQAhRnpaCVHfZPzZZwGSrdYSpujMXYeH4gBru1A1bdzSs2iFB\r
23         nx+jM2j1KL0qXhkqB1A35djiqtI3kofPWRdNYN0CpHApGRVYq0Wtm6z1HoMirAPJcGn0\r
24         V2mkEl5BpCWqsB4+uk0dzrVNSNdlin+SKSRc4=\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
28         b=b3AosuyHqbim7Youn+o6pstcIvxMSS4687E9aT5i1nuuUSjzw6jsIEhnj4NX8vLsL1\r
29         7T1RVOA1QKaVhRnisfh6c6i7VIKXCvqWI8NyeJQsi7VJ3UpWoll8tkedQfv09FrvFFU2\r
30         FMR3/RH/xmLTRwNBYSUrk7eQRscGBkGH/CafU=\r
31 Received: by 10.204.49.82 with SMTP id u18mr3824588bkf.47.1258910459236;\r
32         Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:20:59 -0800 (PST)\r
33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm4547041fks.9.2009.11.22.09.20.57\r
35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
36         Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:20:57 -0800 (PST)\r
37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
39 To: Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@ocjtech.us>, Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>,\r
40         Not Much Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
41 In-Reply-To: <935ead450911220800r47284335n301a2b2432638c72@mail.gmail.com>\r
42 References: <1258897630-22282-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us>\r
43         <20091122141501.GH17268@jukie.net>\r
44         <935ead450911220800r47284335n301a2b2432638c72@mail.gmail.com>\r
45 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:21:28 +0100\r
46 Message-ID:\r
47  <87r5rqmq5j.fsf@kunyang.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
48 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
50 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add SCons build files.\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
53 Precedence: list\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:21:01 -0000\r
64 \r
65 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:00:26 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@ocjtech.us> wrote:\r
66 \r
67 > Yes, I'm sure that make is widely available, but as notmuch gets used\r
68 > on a wider variety of systems some sort of configuration system will\r
69 > become necessary.  If I can prevent another project from going down\r
70 > the autoconf/automake path I'll be happy.  I started creating CMake\r
71 > build files but I don't know CMake well enough to come up with a\r
72 > working build.\r
73 \r
74 I can do a CMake build if that's desirable.  While I prefer it to SCons,\r
75 particularly when config/build times are an issue and you want to have\r
76 several active build trees, it is a significantly heavier dependency.\r
77 With SCons, you can dump scons-local (a pure Python script) into the\r
78 source tree and then users only need Python.  There are lots of other\r
79 lightweight build tools.\r
80 \r
81 Jed\r