Re: Applying patches directly from emails?
[notmuch-archives.git] / 28 / 9a3ffc876856bc134d145c9aa2b92877fe655f
1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430BC429E32\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 08:02:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id HOFifajLFVxj for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Fri,  2 May 2014 08:02:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com\r
18  [74.125.82.46])        (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
19  certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
20  4BC57429E28    for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 08:02:08 -0700\r
21  (PDT)\r
22 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n12so2738958wgh.5\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 08:02:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
25         d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
26         h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent\r
27         :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
28         bh=x3uJIYeWAzCQk7L2dP+pL46MTWlyb0tRoe5OvXotWYM=;\r
29         b=CU36ZmHz/A0vT2f7LKeeIp0PJeJEB4BHjma2a978zj7fDe5nM37jcoFgKQDoY3lf4N\r
30         3oLxyXJSTbGZoQh5sKsJoq5rOfYevuv3M4tfYJswl3kXZncM2oabzALz67nSw1GHZT9X\r
31         tDUVtJRbDCy0ObAarmAVC0xhgjbomRLBpCqjGkFL/3YVSdVCmssPyTuDX//ZIgnKXzOG\r
32         R7iUD0emgkVg9KnT9/rrSFLacWkxYVgDtNswYppH67FAPmRfU2YkO4MQBQykGUOrKJ1M\r
33         0P6dkKnl4h7HZf9+4uYm9hvSrFWfKJiPs/Jx4+H5yGM17xtqNr43mYaJ0VbD0zMV20hR\r
34         dpXQ==\r
35 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
36  ALoCoQl4Sdq/y0WsllcE+5/f8eMMQTnuKT+n6LuqzuKa4Xbukc3gmlOgLR9/qja7QRQy6T6MDNQY\r
37 X-Received: by 10.194.59.43 with SMTP id w11mr2177806wjq.65.1399042923805;\r
38         Fri, 02 May 2014 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:a288:b4ff:fe8a:77d8])\r
40         by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm1362741wja.18.2014.05.02.08.02.01\r
41         for <multiple recipients>\r
42         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
43         Fri, 02 May 2014 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
44 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
45         notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
46 Subject: Re: [PATCH] NEWS: folder:, path:, and database upgrade\r
47 In-Reply-To: <87ppjw9spw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
48 References: <1398609977-9943-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
49         <cunwqe5jn7h.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
50         <87ppjw9spw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
51 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18~rc0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
52         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
53 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
54 Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:01:59 +0100\r
55 Message-ID: <cun7g64gr6g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
56 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
57 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
58         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
61 Precedence: list\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
63         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
70         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 15:02:12 -0000\r
72 \r
73 --=-=-=\r
74 Content-Type: text/plain\r
75 \r
76 On Fri, May 02 2014, Mark Walters wrote:\r
77 > I don't like the wildcard bit as an important part of the change was the\r
78 > removal of stemming. Perhaps keep exact in the headline and in the body\r
79 > say explicitly what the changes are no stemming, no wildcards (except\r
80 > globbing), etc (maybe case sensitivity is different?)\r
81 \r
82 I'm not too upset about exactly what it says.\r
83 \r
84 I wonder how many users care about "the removal of stemming" as opposed\r
85 to "wildcards no longer work", though :-)\r
86 \r
87 > On Thu, 01 May 2014, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
88 >> On Sun, Apr 27 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:\r
89 >>> +The `folder:` search prefix now requires an exact match\r
90 >>\r
91 >> I think that it would be clearer to say:\r
92 >>\r
93 >>   The `folder:` search prefix no longer supports wildcard matching\r
94 >>\r
95 >> (Or something like that.)\r
96 >> _______________________________________________\r
97 >> notmuch mailing list\r
98 >> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
99 >> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
100 \r
101 --=-=-=\r
102 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
103 \r
104 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
105 Version: GnuPG v1\r
106 \r
107 iKYEARECAGYFAlNjs2hfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl\r
108 bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1M0Y5NDJDMEExNjc3MDE4OURGMUYyMDY5\r
109 RUNEMEFCRjA0OTY1MTYACgkQaezQq/BJZRZPdACgiPNc03m000jeJFGqSbzhbTaG\r
110 Py4AoIq25nsuhs4D4Wn0/GAm/ZXP88NB\r
111 =gxag\r
112 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
113 --=-=-=--\r