1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430BC429E32
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 08:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id HOFifajLFVxj for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 2 May 2014 08:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 4BC57429E28 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 08:02:08 -0700
\r
22 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n12so2738958wgh.5
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 08:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
27 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=x3uJIYeWAzCQk7L2dP+pL46MTWlyb0tRoe5OvXotWYM=;
\r
29 b=CU36ZmHz/A0vT2f7LKeeIp0PJeJEB4BHjma2a978zj7fDe5nM37jcoFgKQDoY3lf4N
\r
30 3oLxyXJSTbGZoQh5sKsJoq5rOfYevuv3M4tfYJswl3kXZncM2oabzALz67nSw1GHZT9X
\r
31 tDUVtJRbDCy0ObAarmAVC0xhgjbomRLBpCqjGkFL/3YVSdVCmssPyTuDX//ZIgnKXzOG
\r
32 R7iUD0emgkVg9KnT9/rrSFLacWkxYVgDtNswYppH67FAPmRfU2YkO4MQBQykGUOrKJ1M
\r
33 0P6dkKnl4h7HZf9+4uYm9hvSrFWfKJiPs/Jx4+H5yGM17xtqNr43mYaJ0VbD0zMV20hR
\r
36 ALoCoQl4Sdq/y0WsllcE+5/f8eMMQTnuKT+n6LuqzuKa4Xbukc3gmlOgLR9/qja7QRQy6T6MDNQY
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.194.59.43 with SMTP id w11mr2177806wjq.65.1399042923805;
\r
38 Fri, 02 May 2014 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:a288:b4ff:fe8a:77d8])
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm1362741wja.18.2014.05.02.08.02.01
\r
41 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
43 Fri, 02 May 2014 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
\r
45 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 Subject: Re: [PATCH] NEWS: folder:, path:, and database upgrade
\r
47 In-Reply-To: <87ppjw9spw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
48 References: <1398609977-9943-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
49 <cunwqe5jn7h.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
50 <87ppjw9spw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
51 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18~rc0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
52 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
53 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
54 Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:01:59 +0100
\r
55 Message-ID: <cun7g64gr6g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
57 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
58 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 15:02:12 -0000
\r
74 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
76 On Fri, May 02 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
\r
77 > I don't like the wildcard bit as an important part of the change was the
\r
78 > removal of stemming. Perhaps keep exact in the headline and in the body
\r
79 > say explicitly what the changes are no stemming, no wildcards (except
\r
80 > globbing), etc (maybe case sensitivity is different?)
\r
82 I'm not too upset about exactly what it says.
\r
84 I wonder how many users care about "the removal of stemming" as opposed
\r
85 to "wildcards no longer work", though :-)
\r
87 > On Thu, 01 May 2014, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
88 >> On Sun, Apr 27 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
\r
89 >>> +The `folder:` search prefix now requires an exact match
\r
91 >> I think that it would be clearer to say:
\r
93 >> The `folder:` search prefix no longer supports wildcard matching
\r
95 >> (Or something like that.)
\r
96 >> _______________________________________________
\r
97 >> notmuch mailing list
\r
98 >> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
99 >> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
\r
102 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
104 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
107 iKYEARECAGYFAlNjs2hfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
\r
108 bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1M0Y5NDJDMEExNjc3MDE4OURGMUYyMDY5
\r
109 RUNEMEFCRjA0OTY1MTYACgkQaezQq/BJZRZPdACgiPNc03m000jeJFGqSbzhbTaG
\r
110 Py4AoIq25nsuhs4D4Wn0/GAm/ZXP88NB
\r
112 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r