26/905d7ba4b35cedc0d908ce32139074109bb717

   1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5  by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143D56DE17AA\r
   6  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:47:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.031\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.031 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12  tests=[AWL=-0.055, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
  13  RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1]\r
  14  autolearn=disabled\r
  15 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  16  by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  17  with ESMTP id DdNQPKiKsBe5 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  18  Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:47:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
  19 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com\r
  20  [209.85.212.181])\r
  21  by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2998E6DE1642\r
  22  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:47:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by wicpl12 with SMTP id pl12so3334479wic.0\r
  24  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:47:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  26  d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
  27  h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
  28  :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  29  bh=46gfGInbwfmY24IXn84mkwFi78h/Ng+nWOaAwA9TqW8=;\r
  30  b=VS10N3A+qYvJO91xASaTKbMPxXYT0rGf4TEI1cP7lJTghr6wliHksdJHLgIfEN9hX6\r
  31  m/AyebrvBkrE9Scrx+PTKck7K/OJOQAt7js2twzPfaITZ7Tj71/rVW1Xew1Y1LRn3VMj\r
  32  zkU8qJKEH26Y8B0nhkebWkEZxjSaN2J4QraZ2lRzEmhsgtHzn5zydX/ulohKiwYmGRse\r
  33  aNpM8oIOOgzOfobRsWMJvGyf7aMJ0z4QF0EPMDka9UK+cke9UNavDwbjXUupBTwYTNJy\r
  34  bmXpQ955LUvqzKRpEnmqYMH+KmxHUMjbnjrFhpqmR9LEyHngOXv2bz7JU1fmv6dOx07P\r
  35  dJZQ==\r
  36 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
  37  ALoCoQlL201sFOQinrEa7pbKUEfMLf3hEDkqfe2v0sUi8VJPljkR/bUoXFronHkYyPXuJdwbYDIt\r
  38 X-Received: by 10.194.81.67 with SMTP id y3mr19698969wjx.7.1440920827728;\r
  39  Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:47:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
  40 Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee4f-131.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
  41  [188.238.79.131])\r
  42  by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ll1sm11992136wic.14.2015.08.30.00.47.06\r
  43  (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
  44  Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:47:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
  45 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
  46 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  47 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] cli: change the data structure for notmuch\r
  48  address deduplication\r
  49 In-Reply-To: <87a8t9tuka.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
  50 References: <cover.1440859765.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  51  <ffe5975fd070d3e8e22602b01ceb8bf0d7d47ae0.1440859765.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  52  <87a8t9tuka.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
  53 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+66~gb33abd9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
  54  (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  55 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:47:06 +0300\r
  56 Message-ID: <87egil1amd.fsf@nikula.org>\r
  57 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  58 Content-Type: text/plain\r
  59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
  61 Precedence: list\r
  62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  63  <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  65  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
  67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  70  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  71 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:47:11 -0000\r
  72 \r
  73 On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
  74 > I guess this doesn't make the error handling worse; both old and new\r
  75 > code silently ignore OOM if I understand correctly.\r
  76 \r
  77 Oh, and current git will not silently ignore OOM. It will segfault... ;)\r
  78 \r
  79 BR,\r
  80 Jani.\r