1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE37E40DBD4
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:20:44 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id FDsGGyG8sSWm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:20:34 -0800 (PST)
\r
19 Received: from homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFC840DBC2
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:20:34 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: from homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
24 by homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9031A8061;
\r
25 Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:20:33 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
\r
27 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
28 content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=BwlI5oXX04WXcEJ5o/EOKMkeV8Y
\r
29 1btQf/d5bj1N7g8efr97ZXgGKf4lxKuiAJNKxiXggFgbIqa9wJt740yS3V3levxS
\r
30 bhxlQ1jbMWmM9T+dOrVt7SG+k0ZvN5pw0sS30w4Uo/7QHoZ1kGzK6QI0f1c47lb8
\r
32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to
\r
33 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
34 content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=k2mhvJUVbcMJOEvctSKT/9Y7ejY=; b=h
\r
35 EeQ3yZCdD6MWCQ8EAqzVP6gulhjie7PL0ah5lhBaq7VDjTDM/FCgMV2lf+AsIoKN
\r
36 P5JG/2IuM6IOp6g2qdR8FApwh2xXbfsKQ7IZu3odBKCHH1SmePqdcd+n2ea7SjO/
\r
37 wsHybEBE7TwxMyHwaxVhAD591/zNOTbuZal0LR1B4E=
\r
38 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [84.55.209.24])
\r
39 (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)
\r
40 by homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A05951A8063;
\r
41 Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:20:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
42 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
43 Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:20:29 +0100
\r
44 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
45 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
46 David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Show cleaner addresses during message display.
\r
48 In-Reply-To: <87bp5yxlpe.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
49 References: <1288969456-15997-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
50 <1289324090-25246-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
51 <87bp5yxlpe.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
52 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-127-g6d93d20 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
\r
53 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
54 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:20:29 +0100
\r
55 Message-ID: <87hbfptzk2.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
57 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
58 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:20:44 -0000
\r
74 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
76 On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:53:49 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
\r
77 > Hi, David. I am personally not interested in this collapse for a couple
\r
78 > of reasons. I really like seeing the full address that the mail comes
\r
80 But what is the added benefit of=20
\r
81 "me@foo.com" <me@foo.com>
\r
84 ? This is essentially a nonsense name that can just as well be left
\r
87 > I also don't like tooltips since I don't like using the mouse.
\r
88 > Is it possible to make this particular feature an option?
\r
90 If you don't use a mouse, how does the existence of tooltips annoy you?
\r
92 > I actually frequently yank this whole line to ease filling my address
\r
95 But what is the point of having "me@foo.com" <me@foo.com> in your
\r
96 address book, can't you just as well say "me@foo.com" without loosing
\r
99 Anyway, I don't care strongly either way. I have just gotten very
\r
100 careful in adding new preferences rather than setting sensible defaults
\r
106 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
108 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
109 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
111 iEYEARECAAYFAkzaR70ACgkQVYX1jMgnoGKVdgCdGrrnW8MYIbEjeDuNKB8fltNO
\r
112 p8MAn3l3J2ikns5HDD7tPLXngFLpWfcg
\r
114 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r