1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB87431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id kKk4F-JL3xqZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BE8431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by eaa1 with SMTP id 1so3045809eaa.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
\r
27 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
\r
28 bh=vkbskbJvwYcohu9NE6UBZD1i4oFeKOrwcEHurnnOtr4=;
\r
29 b=U75UrbMUc+7jJaoSBUovdScaZUVA7AKLrr2Wzzak0wJs84KB4bAx/LZyvXP4vptmFK
\r
30 oM/8OA4LMywQiJjflqCo83fNP5jumTQk1zdGjJndw6De/7jwVgTyvmLELyneEkAZvzn2
\r
31 i++licrVXuhF4ldA3klwiVXcbsRGVvsD6DQaycaH46wV95wBOX83UQHHIDHnU+QHWY/d
\r
32 hiqcbkz4XpR2TCmdOXDZz5MWS+3Pb9riXNNUS2ulyEh7K/YdcdDjSV/uv7B4by01LfJR
\r
33 01ewTSHIqqHUZvE67CGdSm2g1DRYMSCQFb4E94h2YtKy9xkMFO8AOFvEOV3/YbRsO80r
\r
36 Received: by 10.213.104.132 with SMTP id p4mr219367ebo.101.1334758282737; Wed,
\r
37 18 Apr 2012 07:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 Received: by 10.213.19.67 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 In-Reply-To: <874nshm9yo.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
40 References: <1334752753-23970-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
41 <1334752753-23970-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
42 <873981chpj.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
43 <CAMP44s2Ukz=kDaPHYG+jzR3pDfZGP+6Ojqc4Xz5J8PxEd9fKcQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
44 <874nshm9yo.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
45 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:11:22 +0300
\r
47 <CAMP44s0qHWGAiGWbKqa3pTJWbpvshoNpoc6EezJmDjE8xQ3ZYA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
48 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Add 'compose' command
\r
49 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
50 To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
53 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:11:28 -0000
\r
68 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
\r
69 <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
72 > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
\r
74 >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
76 >>> Running "notmuch compose" more than once within a second would result i=
\r
78 >>> identical message ids for the messages, which is not a good idea. That'=
\r
80 >>> not likely in interactive use, but the notmuch cli is highly scriptable=
\r
82 >>> so someone is bound to hit this.
\r
84 >>> Some paranoid might also be worried about "leaking" the time you run
\r
85 >>> "notmuch compose"... which may be different from the actual time you
\r
86 >>> send the message.
\r
88 >> It's still better than the current situation; nothing. In any case,
\r
89 >> people that have not needed this would not be affected; their UI would
\r
90 >> override the Message-ID.
\r
93 > I disagree. =C2=A0If notmuch CLI generates a Message-ID, it must be a goo=
\r
95 > one. =C2=A0Otherwise we make users falsely believe that they do have a pr=
\r
97 > Message-ID while in fact they do not. =C2=A0And that would bite them soon=
\r
101 And then they'll report it, and we would fix it.
\r
103 Anyway, everything comes from a patch, so, do you have a patch,
\r
104 pseudo-code, or even a suggestion?
\r