1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336D5431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id a0Ul-8idye3n for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.217.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DFD8431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 05:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id t11so2707636lbd.15
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 05 May 2013 05:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=x-received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
28 bh=3sfUfXwj/Cas7j6AHrHKmem6Q7hZ8momnks11TP5kRM=;
\r
29 b=RzG8gccF60uNVYN8plC8y2cCdAx6L/g3cAoJ2FbWjjtx+PbI49ZSNkZAbmkWNIK7sW
\r
30 KSnFwAl/jMD+/yIxTJR+I8LpbEkSCHOiz5+pvG6UpJsr6oYfE+FXCr0RlVXHLDevOG7s
\r
31 HyMHXzig/xXY6kwaCU+cKw3+ggi1CttKUeCe89rEF50df3SH+ApLVRGnk+TniNz834As
\r
32 C5E7qVAHSlH0nel7dgpkmu4AB+hvrNXbXmw3wQ1kg3GMvrIVluF29FOcoujtXpsFxt3P
\r
33 ElgqUBDitYxZEg3OWkq54YzYNDCPdOCCOxq4QnVLQwR9POWo5rd5FeYUylRdW1XVJq04
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.112.144.36 with SMTP id sj4mr6735405lbb.1.1367757941361;
\r
36 Sun, 05 May 2013 05:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c376-211.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm5364689lbv.14.2013.05.05.05.45.39
\r
40 for <multiple recipients>
\r
41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
42 Sun, 05 May 2013 05:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
44 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>,
\r
45 Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>,
\r
46 notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enhancements to notmuch-hello search history
\r
48 In-Reply-To: <m2li7teoip.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
49 References: <87y5bwkml2.fsf@goose.CSU.McMaster.CA> <874nejrupr.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
50 <87ppx6lo6g.fsf@goose.CSU.McMaster.CA>
\r
51 <m2li7teoip.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
52 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+87~gc69f540 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
53 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
54 Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 15:45:35 +0300
\r
55 Message-ID: <87a9o9fvdc.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
57 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
59 ALoCoQlQNzmZpx+GzR6PZ9U1LhFYO2PvsN0ltE4W+mikj15lxR3cKNfu9eEX735C86ms+pE1ToSj
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:45:49 -0000
\r
74 On Sun, 05 May 2013, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
75 > I agree with Jani that y-or-n-p would suffice for clearing all
\r
76 > recent searches (but yes-or-no-p is not so bad as I originally thought
\r
77 > as C-g can be used to stop processing (typoing 'no' is too easy ;/).
\r
79 > If we could use "undo" feature to restore last clear/del then I'd agree
\r
80 > 100% with Mark (i.e. no y-or-n-p for [del]).
\r
82 > In any case fix at least the style issue Mark mentioned -- any of the
\r
83 > yes/no queries will eventually be fine with me (as I don't know without
\r
84 > experience what would be the best (for me) after all).
\r
86 Servilio, please switch to y-or-n-p in patch 1 and fix the style issue
\r
87 in patch 2, and I think we're happy on the average. :)
\r