1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5AC431FCF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:53:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.693,
\r
12 BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id gQd8++KK3jEu for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:52:59 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D0B431FCB
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:52:59 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu
\r
22 (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)
\r
23 by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o12GqkC9004415
\r
24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
\r
25 Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:52:56 -0500 (EST)
\r
26 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)
\r
27 (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)
\r
28 id 1NcLza-0001Oq-EY; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:52:46 -0500
\r
29 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
30 To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
31 In-Reply-To: <87eil3ehjh.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
32 References: <201001291049.21048.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
33 <1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
34 <87eil3ehjh.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
35 Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:52:43 -0500
\r
36 Message-ID: <87636feg10.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
38 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
39 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
40 X-No-Spam-Score: Local
\r
41 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8
\r
42 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing
\r
43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
47 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
55 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:53:00 -0000
\r
58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
60 On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:20:02 -0500, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure=
\r
62 > I just gave it a try, though, and it seemed to be behaving a little
\r
63 > strangely. I currently have two subdirectories, "inbox" and "sent".
\r
64 > However, new mail to either directory was showing up under the search:
\r
66 > notmuch search folder:inbox
\r
68 > and nothing was showing up under the search:
\r
70 > notmuch search folder:sent
\r
72 > I wonder if there's a problem with the logic it uses to determine the
\r
73 > folder naming? Do you think you could look into this? I would really
\r
74 > like to push to have a patch like this applied upstream soon.
\r
76 I think I was wrong about this. It looks like I'm seeing a different
\r
77 issue that may not be related. As a test I was sending mail to myself,
\r
78 which meant that it was showing up in both "inbox" *and* "sent", and it
\r
79 looks like in the face of an email in duplicate directories, the "inbox"
\r
80 was winning. Mail sent to not me is showing up under folder:sent just
\r
81 fine. So I think this is working!
\r
86 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
88 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
89 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
91 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLaFhbAAoJEO00zqvie6q8PNwP/17WfG/g1lYlURWBMf3oDcXl
\r
92 VyCHbCoTrYF5ym3vOMyYRyO8zjd/rZXSWwaKXdSflzGfHQAO3QHDIOmtuD84NUmG
\r
93 lICTOgn1BUYTTOif0vSb+c283MJNfsqAW0fAkgXFzPQhXUn7ASIOmQnqVpdG3K3T
\r
94 cTBPoyxedrH/BcK2tUzS6oi07fLFdNQeNng79nn3Ug0n1u0pgrunicmjr6bKe1zb
\r
95 rW5fw5ly9VXXHCINX16u43s6iWbuu1nCQVBAHcopR9Yi0hr1H3GvG9WInpacpmFo
\r
96 aT9U85/FmyP0hBm6y/Osdbk8mRYo3S5noOi4549dcLhDmOH1J8IWa+KPLWpMO5mf
\r
97 Q+8KMp+KWdHOj8ZrcoiWH4vbwPe/oxOpJfMN6dzHVBT1Qn58i041nx9oFCcZG+dT
\r
98 vuumHeSpjANM0olCkcxHkuDtK3Wa+xYsJ/D8YFfaOexJjsiMksi6mCe1RDIbZxYT
\r
99 83KX2XpQk77SiQ2mSiEFv8xo5LE7N7r7PZcGPSeWXReHCfcB2HGURyeqUSwBb2oN
\r
100 YGOlQaiJkhRzLFWl5fZxBVfc/eEBzqTsNulir0fGy1wR70SGk+GS4f0Omv94XEPi
\r
101 FzSVQqJzxH6RmyOiDb+Qlb3vvqO/75/LI3IXbcSJsl5N9HP7wavOErv4WppGIg99
\r
102 J10vd1kDreSPO5KurYRC
\r
104 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r