1 Return-Path: <jason@jasonjgw.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E36C4196F2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8,
\r
12 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id KttbMaPu8V7Z for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from opera.rednote.net (opera.rednote.net [208.111.39.221])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415A9431FC1
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from jdc.jasonjgw.net (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by opera.rednote.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3E6tXTZ018694
\r
22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:55:35 GMT
\r
24 Received: by jdc.jasonjgw.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
25 id 9F9C318111C61; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:55:25 +1000 (EST)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jasonjgw.net; s=mail;
\r
27 t=1271228125; bh=Kgu/S7eN8B/CNgaJPxqWEe8XXueHYzX6/ogeRUm98KU=;
\r
28 h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
\r
29 Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
\r
30 b=KAEMDF31+l2qL2mXeLfD2MNxc8euYrfkvUcjDlXSybRKrFUQGOFEQh/tqkPflnDk5
\r
31 nsifLmhKwSdnkuWW8z2PleW81KywTgpo6iNxClaZQ12yRfP8vhcLPOUB5uSfzqpAv3
\r
32 CHa3wAX2COgQad9QSrRwkEyXQxFhHtInJWIEFS3Y=
\r
33 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:55:25 +1000
\r
34 From: Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
\r
35 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
36 Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow to not sort the search results
\r
37 Message-ID: <20100414065525.GA11770@jdc.jasonjgw.net>
\r
38 References: <1271226655-5672-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <1271226655-5672-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
43 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:55:38 -0000
\r
58 Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
\r
59 > previously we were always sorting the returned results by some string value,
\r
60 > but sometimes we might just be interested in the number of results, and don't
\r
63 > Also add a --sort=unsorted command line option to notmuch search to test this.
\r
65 Does this provide relevance-ranked search results? I think relevance ranking
\r
66 is the Xapian default if a sort order isn't specified.
\r
68 It would be useful to be able to obtain a relevance-ranked list of messages or
\r
69 threads that satisfy a query.
\r