1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E29A429E33
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:54:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id TgOacMewzmIp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:54:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7B4429E32
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:54:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by wibhq2 with SMTP id hq2so1086261wib.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:54:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.180.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr9887092wia.9.1325840092109;
\r
25 Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:54:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net
\r
27 (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])
\r
28 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3sm22564161wiz.9.2012.01.06.00.54.50
\r
29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
30 Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:54:51 -0800 (PST)
\r
31 Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)
\r
32 id 25010A1734; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:54:49 +0000 (GMT)
\r
33 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org, david@tethera.net
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <cover.1325794371.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
36 References: <cover.1325794371.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
37 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+151~gbf1dc2b (http://notmuchmail.org)
\r
38 Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
39 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
40 Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:54:45 +0000
\r
41 Message-ID: <cun8vll43e2.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
44 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:54:54 -0000
\r
60 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
62 On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
63 > Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default
\r
64 > in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)?
\r
66 No strong opinion (I hardly ever use the CLI directly).
\r
68 > Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by
\r
69 > default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)?
\r
71 I'd be happy with that.
\r
74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
76 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
77 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
79 iEYEARECAAYFAk8GttUACgkQaezQq/BJZRbjbgCeKgANDg0oAq970P2Jpvf5WP3I
\r
80 +MwAnjFxvmtd6IqEciAWhuoQ3aZzP2X9
\r
82 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r