1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A5B429E31
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id cCyNejZux5Vs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E531431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6892C006;
\r
24 Sun, 5 Jun 2011 09:13:56 +0200 (CEST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
26 :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=vIMschVl9ksaGwY5HicrYP
\r
28 bsxaA=; b=Q2lJX/9NtZgQsWHOUvVQV7hGv6dPgNG39B5JuH2VbCCJsV4BwZZojQ
\r
29 d7sMcM4UX18lvucsvz+W7mEzhIAs9SnM/vXxlsW5MftD7kZ0rBbbZwJjiMD94zfu
\r
30 uLqSp8Hiee1HygCoiUiUuTtME53VgeUg5UyrbNlbhWbdWzz0lkT04=
\r
31 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
\r
33 :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=bf3UGEkeb4m11XRU
\r
34 etC3aPIsf2tR1zQmZxLVXnFkwnug38KxGZ9z1lxiB3euVq1RON3KHYPZ5tdSY5bm
\r
35 7GJC4EAOtmeIKclViGTnNdSYxnWyJ7Qc4/mQ5s1rdITz/W3NfZVZwV0b3QUwMCfA
\r
36 SB6TGgZmKfdg4cwmEqosDJrYnJw=
\r
37 Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
\r
38 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
39 (No client certificate requested)
\r
40 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
\r
41 Sun, 5 Jun 2011 09:13:56 +0200 (CEST)
\r
42 From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>
\r
43 To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,
\r
44 notmuch@dima.secretsauce.net, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <87vcwto5n3.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
47 References: <1306659388-21809-1-git-send-email-notmuch@dima.secretsauce.net>
\r
48 <87vcwto5n3.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
49 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-194-gb20f9fa (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
50 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
\r
51 Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:25:44 +0200
\r
52 Message-ID: <m239joeo3r.fsf@gnu.org>
\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 07:14:01 -0000
\r
72 On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
75 > On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notmuch@dima.secretsauce.net wrote:
\r
76 > > From: Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net>
\r
82 > > I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch allows the user to scroll
\r
83 > > through the most recent searches with C-up and C-down while in the search box.
\r
86 > This sounds like a very nice improvement to me! I just have one
\r
87 > concern: Why C-up and C-down? I believe M-p and M-n would be more
\r
88 > natural for Emacs users (at least for me :)).
\r
90 +1. M-p/M-n is way simpler to remember for me too. IMO, that should be
\r
91 setq'able at the user level to suit best users preferences.
\r