1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F12431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:32 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id LLSpunNzAM9A for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:32 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8366431FAF
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by bkbzt19 with SMTP id zt19so784439bkb.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=nkRWmzCxro2zig2RaplwG+o5cxOt+tO95syZr6VdtNc=;
\r
29 b=mUwjsFplTv/D2SpiufUdFXVn6ZGqlNSwsAuOujQzcH0SEY3XP9DEVHsBa2AYpLMR6o
\r
30 kctyuRVPOb8q3YJNNc2k/V2L6LujZOr+e4EM2xS+YnUYoWB2FlCXWmZfGZLMEfbsxlHx
\r
31 0Sh7TH+8l4WRgA7iFu22NCLoYEVJoeOtlpodM=
\r
32 Received: by 10.204.157.17 with SMTP id z17mr1458271bkw.37.1327599630662;
\r
33 Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
34 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek9sm10331568bkb.10.2012.01.26.09.40.29
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>,
\r
40 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add completion to "tag all" operation ("*"
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <cunobtqlulz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
44 References: <1327540351-5249-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
45 <20120126013727.GB1176@mit.edu> <87wr8fqlpg.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
46 <cunobtqlulz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+116~ge6e10b8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
48 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
49 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:39:22 +0400
\r
50 Message-ID: <87vcny8it1.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:40:32 -0000
\r
67 On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:00 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
68 > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:47:07 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
69 > > > > + ;; Perform some validation
\r
70 > > > > + (let ((words action))
\r
71 > > > > + (when (null words) (error "No operation given"))
\r
72 > > > > + (while words
\r
73 > > > > + (unless (string-match-p "^[-+][-+_.[:word:]]+$" (car words))
\r
74 > > > > + (error "Action must be of the form `+thistag -that_tag'"))
\r
75 > > > > + (setq words (cdr words))))
\r
77 > > > This should really be a mapc or a dolist, but maybe that's for another
\r
80 > > Yes, I changed "this_tag" spelling in v2, but would prefer to leave
\r
81 > > non-trivial changes in this code for another patch.
\r
83 > If you were going to submit another patch then fine, but the chances are
\r
84 > it will just get forgotten.
\r
86 No worries, v5 has a cleanup patch added :)
\r