1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E3D40DF18
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:35:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id BUsiXE5NuA8v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:35:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org (mail.freitas.net [209.234.253.107])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D6440DEF3
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:35:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by rodolpho.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348203CD76;
\r
24 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:35:08 -0500 (EST)
\r
25 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at rodolpho.mayfirst.org
\r
26 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
27 by localhost (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
\r
29 with ESMTP id bhH0F5GLu1Zs; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:35:08 -0500 (EST)
\r
30 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender:
\r
31 smtpauth@rodolpho.mayfirst.org) with ESMTPSA id EF0893CD75
\r
32 Message-ID: <4CE7DC95.2060708@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
33 Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:35:01 -0500
\r
34 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
35 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
\r
36 rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101110 Icedove/3.1.6
\r
38 To: Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>
\r
39 Subject: Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses
\r
40 References: <87ipzvk2xh.fsf@free.fr> <87d3q2sckw.fsf@free.fr>
\r
41 <4CE575CF.2080309@fifthhorseman.net> <87lj4oqlwb.fsf@free.fr>
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87lj4oqlwb.fsf@free.fr>
\r
43 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
\r
44 OpenPGP: id=D21739E9
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
\r
46 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
\r
47 boundary="------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C"
\r
48 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
52 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
54 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:35:25 -0000
\r
64 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
\r
65 --------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C
\r
66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
67 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
69 On 11/20/2010 06:23 AM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
\r
70 > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorse=
\r
72 >> Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:
\r
74 >> On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
\r
75 >>> The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is
\r
76 >>> 2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version packaged for Debian is 2.4.14=
\r
79 >> is the patch that fixes the problem it backportable to 2.4.14 ? I'm
\r
80 >> sure a report to the debian bts with a patch would be appreciated. ev=
\r
82 >> if it doesn't make it into the release because of the freeze, a
\r
83 >> narrowly-targeted patch might be acceptable for a future point release=
\r
86 > Don't know. The main problem is that the package seems to have been mor=
\r
88 > or less abandoned by its maintainer though...=20
\r
90 That's certainly not the case for upstream, where i recently had
\r
91 basically the ideal interaction:
\r
93 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D635152
\r
95 If you're saying the debian package has been abandoned, that's even more
\r
96 of a reason to file a debian bug -- i don't see any listed outstanding
\r
97 issues that might indicate abandonment on either the library package or
\r
100 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=3Dlibgmime-2.4-2
\r
101 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=3Dgmime2.4
\r
103 Filing a bug would help to start documenting abandonment, if that is
\r
104 indeed the case. Once it's documented, we can try to do something about =
\r
112 --------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C
\r
113 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
114 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
\r
115 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
\r
117 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
118 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
119 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
\r
121 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM59yVAAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpWXYP/0+31RWTKfb1s/ylLrw05wFt
\r
122 9T4BPMZ5S2xlzhpV4pBI3ScOZGiT27dTRCw8RBa8oFVxgwHLvyW0kwVg8hUvxqF4
\r
123 Luh7p591pJbVKHArY1UIQf5hsAJ9B7BGgYyU7qzkmvDNspyBx36eScvM9SoA2cJv
\r
124 +xVkkxQA4H7WB2HJEGDK++OI4gYoO5eheYC7pp2mMcAI3VGLM9Izg0gYSuRgaNZu
\r
125 Qb9mHjXF/QiobstERvWVdXnqNUs+1uJCGXUURjq6DEQlv/c5tMmRckn/fdAe7Kqv
\r
126 +9SJ7xDD7AxaICocXmHDHvvuFT1qfg82drAgr4BpuVSP3mWL9tjAxS+o31Ce684i
\r
127 MxrnCIBIyjSfzbQWV0ImWm76mPce9KLRx6ZXg1an8EY2ZC3QlH0XGYSDT8diDUAC
\r
128 ZZb954WftYjJro1j6YOlcwPfbFCgJVwuqXno9Cg6SE1ugRjqu/P2PHXHo3heTYfv
\r
129 vwmLFYT8uJnINuCyZrKo0MGC6HF2B/6aWZGhU8An2+eyXLXDkCHk5c+SBF/LfiE9
\r
130 YtayBT2uVf3lCWeiPDAvFtMYBNHfowz3vJX3wJiVoiEQwIXppPY8njcGsOLmiX1W
\r
131 NbEBPJBoMCFJYbb6CmTCvSVe/Kfq1rja8rWSRN/kkyTxuQrZx4SGZoO/1v+NMw/4
\r
132 ZggHaEAmIc+Juq15MYdq
\r
134 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
136 --------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C--
\r