notmuch and "mute" -- useful to anyone?
[notmuch-archives.git] / 1d / 494dd6ba11688906daa1d876ab7758e656b16c
1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E3D40DF18\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:35:24 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -1.899\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id BUsiXE5NuA8v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:35:11 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org (mail.freitas.net [209.234.253.107])\r
18         (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D6440DEF3\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:35:11 -0800 (PST)\r
22 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
23         by rodolpho.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348203CD76;\r
24         Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:35:08 -0500 (EST)\r
25 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at rodolpho.mayfirst.org\r
26 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
27         by localhost (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,\r
28         port 10024)\r
29         with ESMTP id bhH0F5GLu1Zs; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:35:08 -0500 (EST)\r
30 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender:\r
31         smtpauth@rodolpho.mayfirst.org) with ESMTPSA id EF0893CD75\r
32 Message-ID: <4CE7DC95.2060708@fifthhorseman.net>\r
33 Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:35:01 -0500\r
34 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
35 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;\r
36         rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101110 Icedove/3.1.6\r
37 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
38 To: Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>\r
39 Subject: Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses\r
40 References: <87ipzvk2xh.fsf@free.fr> <87d3q2sckw.fsf@free.fr>\r
41         <4CE575CF.2080309@fifthhorseman.net> <87lj4oqlwb.fsf@free.fr>\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87lj4oqlwb.fsf@free.fr>\r
43 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2\r
44 OpenPGP: id=D21739E9\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
46         protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
47         boundary="------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C"\r
48 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
51 Precedence: list\r
52 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
54         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:35:25 -0000\r
63 \r
64 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
65 --------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C\r
66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
67 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
68 \r
69 On 11/20/2010 06:23 AM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:\r
70 > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:51:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorse=\r
71 man.net> wrote:\r
72 >> Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses:\r
73 >>\r
74 >> On 11/18/2010 01:37 PM, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:\r
75 >>> The problem is solved in version 2.4.18 (current is\r
76 >>> 2.4.20). Unfortunately the last version packaged for Debian is 2.4.14=\r
77 =2E..\r
78 >>\r
79 >> is the patch that fixes the problem it backportable to 2.4.14 ?  I'm\r
80 >> sure a report to the debian bts with a patch would be appreciated.  ev=\r
81 en\r
82 >> if it doesn't make it into the release because of the freeze, a\r
83 >> narrowly-targeted patch might be acceptable for a future point release=\r
84 =2E\r
85 >=20\r
86 > Don't know. The main problem is that the package seems to have been mor=\r
87 e\r
88 > or less abandoned by its maintainer though...=20\r
89 \r
90 That's certainly not the case for upstream, where i recently had\r
91 basically the ideal interaction:\r
92 \r
93   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D635152\r
94 \r
95 If you're saying the debian package has been abandoned, that's even more\r
96 of a reason to file a debian bug -- i don't see any listed outstanding\r
97 issues that might indicate abandonment on either the library package or\r
98 its source:\r
99 \r
100  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=3Dlibgmime-2.4-2\r
101  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=3Dgmime2.4\r
102 \r
103 Filing a bug would help to start documenting abandonment, if that is\r
104 indeed the case.  Once it's documented, we can try to do something about =\r
105 it.\r
106 \r
107 Regards,\r
108 \r
109         --dkg\r
110 \r
111 \r
112 --------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C\r
113 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
114 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
115 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
116 \r
117 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
118 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
119 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
120 \r
121 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM59yVAAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpWXYP/0+31RWTKfb1s/ylLrw05wFt\r
122 9T4BPMZ5S2xlzhpV4pBI3ScOZGiT27dTRCw8RBa8oFVxgwHLvyW0kwVg8hUvxqF4\r
123 Luh7p591pJbVKHArY1UIQf5hsAJ9B7BGgYyU7qzkmvDNspyBx36eScvM9SoA2cJv\r
124 +xVkkxQA4H7WB2HJEGDK++OI4gYoO5eheYC7pp2mMcAI3VGLM9Izg0gYSuRgaNZu\r
125 Qb9mHjXF/QiobstERvWVdXnqNUs+1uJCGXUURjq6DEQlv/c5tMmRckn/fdAe7Kqv\r
126 +9SJ7xDD7AxaICocXmHDHvvuFT1qfg82drAgr4BpuVSP3mWL9tjAxS+o31Ce684i\r
127 MxrnCIBIyjSfzbQWV0ImWm76mPce9KLRx6ZXg1an8EY2ZC3QlH0XGYSDT8diDUAC\r
128 ZZb954WftYjJro1j6YOlcwPfbFCgJVwuqXno9Cg6SE1ugRjqu/P2PHXHo3heTYfv\r
129 vwmLFYT8uJnINuCyZrKo0MGC6HF2B/6aWZGhU8An2+eyXLXDkCHk5c+SBF/LfiE9\r
130 YtayBT2uVf3lCWeiPDAvFtMYBNHfowz3vJX3wJiVoiEQwIXppPY8njcGsOLmiX1W\r
131 NbEBPJBoMCFJYbb6CmTCvSVe/Kfq1rja8rWSRN/kkyTxuQrZx4SGZoO/1v+NMw/4\r
132 ZggHaEAmIc+Juq15MYdq\r
133 =NomS\r
134 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
135 \r
136 --------------enig6EF516B7014F7F51296BD19C--\r