18/fa32277c4b28406a66268909bb68071d981479

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B9A431FAE\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:29:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id bPqNDRbav5rP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:29:46 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.213.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5D0429E25\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:29:46 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by yenl3 with SMTP id l3so1377105yen.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:29:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version\r
  27         :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
  28         bh=t+oPPmBDN/bO6+qfFl1TnZLALfqllvUv4b7YqQQxypw=;\r
  29         b=1GERwx4QlOqR8wMEfqK/WsVAVivwZ24g8zxH1mh+ZOSjILI0i/Lzta3h1iMkoynQFd\r
  30         TrI1o2cZYyhvxlY3ks/sWFcYLE1uqMwtUb0B/ZlIR8QVCz8DhHtuHWDkY9zqlQs9Z7Xz\r
  31         ROp4EUJFzXXygfMrUXhAuew1FUyzWLtKuP+6aocFHeGgnnTFgMt4t8N1KoEfb5h2EXh3\r
  32         /Tl5eRHic9RpCjBoqlb/L7a09B3NyLWTKFa3l07BoByGMVf9FoQ8BayCPaoadZbav560\r
  33         oWJtB1ghL2zfHuRCVE4XUQYe+es2xnt4BykrlGxzSzoTYsOMz+ySUs/ZanO7xE/v9Sjk\r
  34         43Rw==\r
  35 Received: by 10.68.125.228 with SMTP id mt4mr77780509pbb.21.1342009784467;\r
  36         Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:29:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
  37 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  38         [220.233.42.215])\r
  39         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pn5sm1630902pbb.74.2012.07.11.05.29.40\r
  40         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
  41         Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:29:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
  42 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:29:37 +1000\r
  43 Message-ID: <20120711222937.GA11201@hili.localdomain>\r
  44 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  45 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Control notmuch show output\r
  47 In-Reply-To: <1341673978-6094-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
  48 References: <1341673978-6094-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
  49 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  51 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  55 Precedence: list\r
  56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  57         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  65 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:29:47 -0000\r
  66 \r
  67 On Sat,  7 Jul 2012 16:12:55 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  68 > \r
  69 > Do people have any comments in the current form?\r
  70 \r
  71 Very nice!\r
  72 \r
  73 Peter\r