1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C90431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:22 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id ZJPVIpKB4qrJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55C9431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by bkcit16 with SMTP id it16so4630255bkc.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com
\r
26 designates 10.204.152.7 as permitted sender)
\r
27 client-ip=10.204.152.7;
\r
28 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
\r
29 dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com designates 10.204.152.7 as permitted
\r
30 sender) smtp.mail=dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com;
\r
31 dkim=pass header.i=dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com
\r
32 Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.152.7])
\r
33 by 10.204.152.7 with SMTP id e7mr9617915bkw.70.1329672680456 (num_hops
\r
34 = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
36 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
37 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
38 bh=G3J8PuPfV9b+r5WaJfD8SrPFbJ7PIprwTMMgWbm0s/Y=;
\r
39 b=baJOD5O0mN5sOpLSvc9e4m4Zi5BAfvnykIbP071V84MwYql7mDQXNvg5x1ZpZk/upT
\r
40 dHC9Fdm2EU25YiSChisosQ5NhQV9AV7KWfulxQoKi+q7Lx47VVFN/6+MfgGLNL5c900O
\r
41 ZpgUR0ZnOyHByRYAGeGdsTq1lZVGiORAQmyDk=
\r
42 Received: by 10.204.152.7 with SMTP id e7mr7800322bkw.70.1329672678892;
\r
43 Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
44 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
45 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm34213369bkb.8.2012.02.19.09.31.17
\r
46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
47 Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:31:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
48 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
49 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
50 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make notmuch-show-refresh-view retain state by
\r
52 In-Reply-To: <20120219172541.GQ5991@mit.edu>
\r
53 References: <1329632533-16152-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>
\r
54 <m2k43jw43j.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <20120219172541.GQ5991@mit.edu>
\r
55 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+188~ga5674c2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
56 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
57 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0400
\r
58 Message-ID: <87zkceloiz.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
61 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
62 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
63 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
65 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
66 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
69 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
70 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
71 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
72 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
73 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
74 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:31:22 -0000
\r
76 On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:25:41 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
\r
77 > Quoth Tomi Ollila on Feb 19 at 11:43 am:
\r
78 > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:22:10 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
\r
79 > > > Based on the thread at id:"20120213152858.GO27039@mit.edu" it seems
\r
80 > > > like people want show refresh to retain message state by default (I
\r
81 > > > certainly do), rather than reset it by default. As a nice bonus, this
\r
82 > > > fixes a broken test.
\r
86 > > Every '=' keypress in a thread removes 'unread' tag from next unread
\r
89 > Oh dear. It's slightly subtler than that, though. Refreshing will
\r
90 > remove the unread tag from the first message matching the query. (I
\r
91 > suspect you had tag:unread in your query?) This is particularly
\r
92 > confusing for state-retaining refresh because that message might not
\r
95 > > That is probably desirable feature when refreshing view without
\r
96 > > retaining state. Also, probably notmuch-show-refresh-view should
\r
97 > > be fixed not to mark next message unread when retaining state ?
\r
99 > I would argue that refresh should never have side-effects, so neither
\r
100 > case should mark anything read. I'll send a v2.
\r
102 I agree. But this looks like a separate issue, no? So why v2 instead
\r
103 of a separate patch/series?
\r
108 > _______________________________________________
\r
109 > notmuch mailing list
\r
110 > notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
111 > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
\r