1 Return-Path: <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE0B431FB5
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:48:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id rqrfdWFteKXh for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:48:13 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86772431FB6
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:48:13 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
21 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C054F90D34;
\r
22 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:11 -0600 (CST)
\r
23 Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])
\r
24 by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98239500FB;
\r
25 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:11 -0600 (CST)
\r
26 Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
27 id 80FF97BB463; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:11 -0600 (CST)
\r
28 From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
\r
29 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
30 Subject: Re: Folder-based searching
\r
31 References: <87tyh9wzs2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
32 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:11 -0600
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87tyh9wzs2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> (Carl Worth's message of
\r
34 "Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:46:53 -0800")
\r
35 Message-ID: <87oc7fe590.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
\r
36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
\r
38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
39 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
43 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
44 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
45 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
46 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
47 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
48 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
50 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
52 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:48:14 -0000
\r
54 Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> writes:
\r
56 > Someone bringing in mail from such a system might want to migrate from
\r
57 > information in directory names to instead be information in notmuch
\r
58 > tags. That might look something like this:
\r
60 > notmuch tag +important folder:important
\r
62 Nice. So what are the path semantics? For example, is the path case
\r
63 sensitive or insensitive? Can you say folder:foo/bar, and if so, is the
\r
64 path rooted, or can it match path sub-segments?
\r
66 i.e. which of these, if any, is "folder:foo/bar" like?
\r
75 rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
\r
76 GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
\r