1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD617431E64
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 05:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id lMJxmjoP+Dc7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 1 Apr 2013 05:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7B9431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 05:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fo12so2062220lab.14
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 05:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
27 :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
28 bh=ej+t9G0Su+ZCswvLRhwmxi9FBfmuslrLOEnbXNdxT+4=;
\r
29 b=Y0j6HBtGU4BBZqcziskThwHjh3EIG9iSrGxcjHNSXPOzhhtEND7lP3GjHsKfXXmFCM
\r
30 PjbQZRJm1w4g7Bfr9WHqdjzebG557BegDJ/w741TndbgQXaysH5zBblq1fSTvQNhOpvs
\r
31 OF61itcpLL0noIjQXLIFtywCJtGvshd/AycBDwhdafXM6tAYXUv+6ABIcatTIJTIkNHn
\r
32 y/XvWfg2P/rrHwoalNdpZjhkfYIAWKQGWNbsQq0yxyufD5NH5DQ8a34N0mylaB4ELCf7
\r
33 ygDPwnEbcFoePFQA9Bn1lQgB98WozZ/h8BJ7ljVKyPV94jAXCYc3LgCMYN6VzslIsIQB
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.112.9.200 with SMTP id c8mr5670298lbb.122.1364818294756;
\r
36 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 05:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-50df51-27.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm5398624lbz.3.2013.04.01.05.11.32
\r
40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
41 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 05:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
42 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
43 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nmbug-status: simplify config file read from nmbug
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <87ip46xyez.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
47 References: <cover.1364809172.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
48 <41d8f64a00a516faaa51871e2cb060bb1d0c8a8a.1364809172.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
49 <87ip46xyez.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+48~gc5630bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
\r
51 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:11:31 +0300
\r
53 Message-ID: <87fvzasb64.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
57 ALoCoQkYsI+6RVW4a3FsWZFNNxNwaO6Zs7jgDAZAybHaVBFddU6Y9Lvw9/PRwSReef5n1NUYnpvy
\r
58 Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
63 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:11:41 -0000
\r
73 On Mon, 01 Apr 2013, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
74 > Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:
\r
76 >> This should be functionally the same as before.
\r
79 > Except that if a local config branch does not exist (but the remote one
\r
80 > does) the old complicated version works, while the new one does ont. Do
\r
81 > you want to try again, or just go with the other two patches?
\r
83 Right. Thanks for the explanation. Let's just drop this patch.
\r