1 Return-Path: <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98DB41ED95
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:03:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 3B1lhIdT7emJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:03:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 X-Greylist: delayed 456 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;
\r
19 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:03:20 PST
\r
20 Received: from avasout06.plus.net (avasout06.plus.net [212.159.14.18])
\r
21 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
22 (No client certificate requested)
\r
23 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FAD431FCB
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:03:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 Received: from [192.168.1.22] ([80.229.236.194]) by avasout06 with smtp
\r
26 id xKqE1p0014CLJ5401KqFr7; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:50:18 +0000
\r
28 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=IIyMC2fG c=1 sm=1 tr=0
\r
29 a=G4bc5lkgapKKm1P+Twxy3Q==:117 a=G4bc5lkgapKKm1P+Twxy3Q==:17
\r
31 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=80hmnl3cAAAA:8 a=dFffnLBqAAAA:8
\r
32 a=R_kyWn8I58ESfnoXU0oA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
\r
33 References: <54E3BAE1.1030004@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
34 <87pp97sldj.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
35 <ed7f5ff35a6d784885b68666fe5b5898.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>
\r
36 <87zj88wjgy.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
37 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
\r
38 In-Reply-To: <87zj88wjgy.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
39 Content-Type: text/plain;
\r
41 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
42 Message-Id: <79D823A8-925A-478E-9734-9702C311A4F8@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
43 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257)
\r
44 From: Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
45 Subject: Re: Inspired but need help searching folder names containing spaces
\r
46 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:50:16 +0000
\r
47 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
48 Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:03:24 -0000
\r
64 > On 20 Feb 2015, at 18:01, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
66 >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk> wrote:
\r
67 >> A couple of others things have surprised me, though. Using the date searc=
\r
69 >> option, such as date:"today" or date:"yesterday", hasn't quite thrown up
\r
70 >> what I expected. Searching with date:"today" shows up no results (which I=
\r
72 >> know is wrong) and searching with date:"yesterday" shows up a handful of
\r
73 >> emails all from the same person, in different threads which all arrived o=
\r
75 >> a day in May 2014... Got to be a bug there somewhere :-D
\r
77 > This is a known limitation in the date: prefix queries. You have to
\r
78 > specify it as a range, for example date:today..today (from the beginning
\r
79 > of today until the end of today). If the underlying Xapian search engine
\r
80 > is not given a range expression (with the "..") it searches for the
\r
81 > words "date today" without punctuation, matching whatever it matches,
\r
82 > and notmuch does not even get an error for it.
\r
84 Thanks. Explains everything. Any thoughts on searching on 'to' only? I'm not=
\r
85 sure if this is also related to what Xapian needs to be provided with. If n=
\r
86 ot, and if only searching in the to, cc and bcc fields of the header is poss=
\r
87 ible, maybe we could consider adopting and integrating case sensitive syntax=
\r
88 in notmuch such as TO:me rather than to:me..?
\r