1 Return-Path: <aaronecay@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F580431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:26:07 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id rGpML9AXnjBD for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:26:07 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com (mail-qw0-f46.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 009FF431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:26:06 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by qadc10 with SMTP id c10so151809qad.5
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:26:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
\r
28 bh=k83eLvp1b9blcJOVO0Ip778Si6nLEl/twSHaIaZtfu8=;
\r
29 b=beN62QqV5q770xiLZsrM8eTm0jGmMULoA/7TEq76m8QrrcdDKbI8X9T5ZFkipizXAq
\r
30 vWGX9AbBbvVbnfpZ04Xk2yMLPOWuVqv86mlX4h/wIPwhnB75mYcnRXDOf95HwZ7++ISg
\r
31 mS2LSd5UQkcrB6um4a8HBj4rANChJZdR2Ru2E=
\r
32 Received: by 10.224.18.201 with SMTP id x9mr10349920qaa.61.1327029965475;
\r
33 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:26:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
34 Received: from localhost (c-68-80-94-73.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [68.80.94.73])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm3761452qaj.0.2012.01.19.19.26.04
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:26:04 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Quote MML tags in replies
\r
41 In-Reply-To: <87obtzuvmj.fsf@praet.org>
\r
42 References: <1326998589-37187-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com>
\r
43 <20120119224842.GS16740@mit.edu>
\r
44 <m2vco72tf3.fsf@wal122.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>
\r
45 <87obtzuvmj.fsf@praet.org>
\r
46 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+73~gd51b784 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.2
\r
47 (i386-apple-darwin10.8.0)
\r
48 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:26:02 -0500
\r
49 Message-ID: <m2sjjb2gxh.fsf@wal122.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
53 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:07 -0000
\r
68 On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:21:08 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
69 > So, would I be right to assume MML tags in signatures are never
\r
70 > evaluated to begin with? Otherwise, there would still be a security
\r
73 I am thinking of MML tags that a user puts in their own signature.
\r
74 If that case is a security hole, then the hole is in the user=E2=80=99s bra=
\r
76 and not in notmuch. :)
\r