notmuch and "mute" -- useful to anyone?
[notmuch-archives.git] / 06 / 723076259612ea4c368efb4f4971372da9ec70
1 Return-Path: <amdragon@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B178429E5F\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:35:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id JCAdjm0ovK9o for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com\r
19         [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD51429E5B\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so626357qyk.5\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date\r
27         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
28         bh=mpMO3OKuarI4kVVg29vq4iT6gfAKloRMnxzbY2Sq/rk=;\r
29         b=RMQE1tqXcmpeffRmbo0bouKMdNZPEb/PQCHwCd1iyELbjd/IpRFPtUjvTrUOP/oZlh\r
30         1GajUIUSdY5l6OBdHcU2HlrDQ5pJWIogoSJFH8wpKQGwTfL6TF+nskwlXAsp66GuqwLU\r
31         1SUffUD0Lb0+TSYXFYyxPN5H/Z8T+LvZ2KslQ=\r
32 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
33 Received: by 10.229.2.89 with SMTP id 25mr335790qci.39.1309332898837; Wed, 29\r
34         Jun 2011 00:34:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
35 Sender: amdragon@gmail.com\r
36 Received: by 10.229.249.193 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:34:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
37 In-Reply-To: <87r56d7as1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
38 References: <1309236311-2162-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
39         <1309236311-2162-10-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
40         <87hb798uz7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87wrg5wq8o.fsf@gmail.com>\r
41         <87r56d7as1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
42 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:34:58 -0400\r
43 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kq-Gqsb4iTPxIycmxYtRjUb89xE\r
44 Message-ID:\r
45  <CAH-f9Wv1HA4HB1fFz01nWYPyYaEpj9GF5ydryNY050RmmOvXxA@mail.gmail.com>\r
46 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] test: use emacsclient(1) for Emacs tests\r
47 From: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>\r
48 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
50 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
53 Precedence: list\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:35:00 -0000\r
64 \r
65 On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
66 > That means that if the emacs_deliver_message code is fast enough, (less\r
67 > than 1 second), and if the test suite is being run on a lame filesystem\r
68 > without sub-second timestamp granularity (including ext3fs) that the\r
69 > "notmuch new" invocation will not see the mail[*].\r
70 \r
71 Or, really, any file system, since notmuch doesn't currently take\r
72 advantage of sub-second mtimes.\r
73 \r
74 > [*] And, yes, this does mean that there are race conditions under which\r
75 > mail can be delivered and notmuch won't see it, (unless subsequent mails\r
76 > are delivered to the same directory). Austin has a plan to fix the use\r
77 > of the mtime timestamp in notmuch, (never storing the current mtime in\r
78 > the database if it's the same as the current time), that should\r
79 > hopefully close this race window.\r
80 \r
81 Posted.\r