1 Return-Path: <amdragon@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE41429E25
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 63UQ0qoXYRRY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA82F431FD0
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so3295453qyk.5
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
\r
27 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
29 bh=5eGvopmPY/zUfeyxwWvWilkwvym1MqPqtspv6+v4DAE=;
\r
30 b=NmttHb1gY8exxNw52odQBIGagKaPdCVtT+S4pvtoYoj+0U16ibwEBDgbpRKoWjnsJY
\r
31 pPKjIJDBGQ3tnvxXHdgOsVzq/IPi+jobfLLcPgxpYl58Daoe1kEZ15DmHJ9T5FfWQS42
\r
32 iUvcaMxnqVXHQd4QLXgIAXCOy2f65v7h9jwa4=
\r
33 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
34 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
\r
35 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
\r
36 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
37 b=OeSvf39lJwBeZ+zSYbB8n/HPXLcJzjTuf4rdcGobb9NLJ5mDJJ9Z+OHN2NOsp5mw7G
\r
38 1O/eFLXKv8GxADXhYg/QSI/JuO8ATlRg2qqRzU29SVK4HXwTGI975RfQFbNpeuYq8kfm
\r
39 Isf2UWeI16bWzJjDRTCiJRiDI/14Yt/4Vs+2s=
\r
41 Received: by 10.229.31.1 with SMTP id w1mr5065785qcc.138.1309208281047; Mon,
\r
42 27 Jun 2011 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 Sender: amdragon@gmail.com
\r
44 Received: by 10.229.32.197 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
45 In-Reply-To: <87sjqvw64n.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
46 References: <87sjqvw64n.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
47 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:58:00 -0400
\r
48 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lI70ejrYxb7ATdRuBoNpin0Ihdw
\r
49 Message-ID: <BANLkTikhyA-9hrr8WfJvYP50OcYPsMiiuQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
50 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test:Folder tags shouldn't match after removal of file in
\r
52 From: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>
\r
53 To: Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com>
\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
55 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:58:02 -0000
\r
71 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
72 > +test_begin_subtest "Test matches folder:spam"
\r
73 > +output=3D$(notmuch search folder:spam)
\r
74 > +test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:0000000000000001 =A0 2001-01-05 [1/1=
\r
75 ] Notmuch Test Suite; Test message #1 (inbox unread)"
\r
79 I assume this has to do with directory mtime's. Is it sufficient to
\r
80 instead increment_mtime $dir/spam after the rm below?
\r
83 > +test_begin_subtest "Remove folder:spam copy of email"
\r
84 > +rm $dir/spam/$(basename $file_x)
\r
85 > +output=3D$(NOTMUCH_NEW)
\r
86 > +test_expect_equal "$output" "No new mail. Detected 1 file rename."
\r