Re: Better Gmail handling by not using Notmuch tags
[notmuch-archives.git] / 03 / a8c2dba47f4a7575b2c3a34be3dc9552ce5443
1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD456431FBC\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:04:40 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
10         with ESMTP id HDbP6xfwUjV8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
11         Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:04:40 -0800 (PST)\r
12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
13         [209.85.218.224])\r
14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFD3431FAE\r
15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:04:39 -0800 (PST)\r
16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so1712027bwz.30\r
17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:04:39 -0800 (PST)\r
18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject:date\r
20         :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
21         bh=nvNLE60CEIJfBsefsnrhp+mWnbIEMCE2aqjdmzvDiMI=;\r
22         b=p+2fBh5a2FuY6ZuPwWVuO8Bg9DXSNenlupLOh/wKKDRsRkCeG3bYGy8GW8817RtxPG\r
23         ZiGtBvuq4f4k5OPQH1p9ingFB8aGNMVpAR3Xj3DEFnQl+fEMByFphQP8HvCijQ5/OmW8\r
24         rmF8UrDWKuG3UxKCRNDzRe44gd4TgpJp8EZqo=\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
27         b=r/nyAP+kBzbOj5x5KNdJ8E4GHp3ulT+TQe/6uXcSzcYmtLV5ORiyc4BShXmVyHyaxH\r
28         PhMo092+VePu7bCG0g51VDOYH8mOIzU5teD+kAUQ09krShhAirZukAMvSFwMRTsnSjuH\r
29         nx3CF+IVnbfQos+2zSzk7K50qNEPaW1PJiGqU=\r
30 Received: by 10.204.154.207 with SMTP id p15mr2353541bkw.202.1259424274384;\r
31         Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:04:34 -0800 (PST)\r
32 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
33         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm871693fxm.7.2009.11.28.08.04.32\r
34         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
35         Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:04:33 -0800 (PST)\r
36 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
37 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
38 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
39 Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:05:06 +0100\r
40 Message-ID: <877htavdn1.fsf@59A2.org>\r
41 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
42 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
43         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
44 Subject: [notmuch] Mailing list Reply-To munging and notmuch reply\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
47 Precedence: list\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
49         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
51         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:04:40 -0000\r
58 \r
59 --=-=-=\r
60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
61 \r
62 First, I'm aware that such munging is A Bad Thing\r
63 \r
64   http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html\r
65 \r
66 but a lot of lists do it anyway (mostly to work around widely used\r
67 mailers with lame defaults).  After munging, we get headers looking like\r
68 this\r
69 \r
70   From: Some User <some.user@example.com>\r
71   To: Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>\r
72   Reply-To: Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>\r
73 =20=20\r
74 Notmuch reply produces\r
75 \r
76   To: Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>,\r
77       Sample users list <sample-users@sample.org>\r
78 \r
79 Handling this is a bit messy, I think we want the current behavior\r
80 unless To matches Reply-To, in which case we use From and Reply-To.  If\r
81 this is indeed the least bad behavior, I will make a patch for it.\r
82 \r
83 Jed\r
84 \r
85 --=-=-=\r
86 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
87 \r
88 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
89 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
90 \r
91 iEYEARECAAYFAksRSjIACgkQU7Rz1O1Q6ovzkACeLpDvMMQlE/iTEHym4QERgIr3\r
92 a9UAn0gzV7Ll8GFran+vpfcZngsePj1j\r
93 =50e2\r
94 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
95 --=-=-=--\r