1 Return-Path: <vashirov@redhat.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3046DE0173
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005,
\r
12 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
\r
13 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
\r
15 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id dGLqX3hwHyg3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
\r
20 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20E26DE0005
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
\r
23 (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])
\r
24 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
\r
25 (No client certificate requested)
\r
26 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B68EA4E327;
\r
27 Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:02:08 +0000 (UTC)
\r
28 Received: from slowpoke.usersys.redhat.com.redhat.com
\r
29 (ovpn-204-32.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.32])
\r
30 by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
\r
32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
\r
33 Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:02:07 -0400
\r
34 From: Viktor Ashirov <vashirov@redhat.com>
\r
35 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
36 Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs should correctly handle signature status on reply
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <87d1lpdg5e.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
38 References: <87invii1t7.fsf@slowpoke.usersys.redhat.com>
\r
39 <87d1lpdg5e.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.94.1
\r
41 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:02:03 +0200
\r
43 Message-ID: <87popp6dtw.fsf@slowpoke.usersys.redhat.com>
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
46 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
47 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27
\r
48 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
\r
49 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:02:08 +0000 (UTC)
\r
50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
54 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
60 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:02:21 -0000
\r
65 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
67 On Wed, Aug 03 2016 at 11:30:05 am, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
\r
68 > On Wed 2016-08-03 06:28:36 -0400, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
\r
70 >> in notmuch-emacs, when I reply to multipart/signed email, signature
\r
71 >> status gets inserted in the cited message, like this:
\r
75 >>> [ Unknown signature status ]
\r
79 >> Even though signature was verified when email is viewed in notmuch-show
\r
81 >> [ multipart/signed ]
\r
82 >> [ Good signature by: John Doe <jdoe@example.org> ]
\r
86 >> So I'd like to be able to
\r
87 >> 1. Not include signature status in the cited message
\r
88 >> 2. But when I want to include it, it should be correctly processed.
\r
90 > fwiw, i think that the cited message should never include signature or
\r
91 > decryption status, and the presence of these fields in the output of
\r
92 > notmuch-reply is a bug.
\r
94 > I see no reason to make it configurable to show them, and some good
\r
95 > reasons not to: it's arguably a leak of information about your private
\r
96 > view of the world to include this stuff in a reply (the user can always
\r
97 > choose to write about their private view of the world manually if they
\r
99 I see your point, and I agree.
\r
101 > notmuch-emacs already has too many options, and we should be
\r
102 > parsimonious about adding new ones.
\r
104 > i suggest dropping the signature and encryption status entirely from
\r
113 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
115 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
118 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXohV7AAoJENolJPs2TTN4C8wP/2ARrM9TgvE2icrUuTT8pW07
\r
119 ++j7IGEFD97WZGz4B2P5Uuepzb3WEpLPDMtJMuquScc3KOOWM8eArTbwt6XoZl9w
\r
120 Iem56Y4Bm3uri6JWs8bQBzS5yowE/no2xQ3CyTNjhAN1mzC1KV92vz3nzJGZ7ejc
\r
121 MU0FtHuOsKTklP7+8B4gfVOPv3EB7y3HReQ7uxg2o5SeE9MqrP8zTKjTrnxiKIf7
\r
122 pJNGo2zy/+FlE7F3bseFu2INyVS1Bajmoy9+qQ6r82l83+kFx4PbksV8QJhCvTMg
\r
123 RfAfGejfCLkMiba9An/5PlbYF46mK5dlrjQ+zhTBa8JB3dCLPH+X2QzL3+CnKhFc
\r
124 ClyGf9xPYC1r+FuIXzR86T8/z0+T5b/NuFTvO9qcouTSCwDz9RrDctSw2+ZCdG+4
\r
125 0Vuujh2A6jPVI319LTtGIlFJ+GZpH8klMZLt3G4C6eD6v1isxxXX/sAv8+oFggxH
\r
126 YWglnJZoQv8NRwSVl7AiIG4bFAoqKOThAPlsn2WZ8JVxJtQ7FKi6wDVb80iKv2Qq
\r
127 sx28xqMpdQ4NuvlfOknXvLRUuLTVDGp8MGEiESZmJQK8dHZoWQRSxtB/xdvBDT4v
\r
128 ytqY10DcFXbmB8l9oW9QjyK1Y4aTeJ5NNPJMv+UirK6M0fKGx9+zgaCg9+hfiDYm
\r
129 zmtfOaZs38iXKHEMp1ZX
\r
131 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r