RE: Reply all - issue
[notmuch-archives.git] / 00 / 57793529219f7e76d0011938dfde037a0ce231
1 Return-Path: <albin.stjerna@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFBE431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:42:44 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Cc"\r
9 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
10 X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
11 X-Spam-Level: \r
12 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
13         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
14         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
17         with ESMTP id ZmS5WAcqR0lw for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
18         Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:42:44 -0800 (PST)\r
19 Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com (mail-bw0-f45.google.com\r
20         [209.85.214.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
21         (No client certificate requested)\r
22         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430FB431FB5\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:42:44 -0800 (PST)\r
24 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so3475495bwz.18\r
25         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:42:42 -0800 (PST)\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
27         h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:to:cc:cc:subject:in-reply-to\r
28         :references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
29         bh=ibWg9mwWsRQ45sroTmzAhXyjhDk37GsX9LvoZlZM/sg=;\r
30         b=kNLkVptB7ncosTMvCgkVSgq4qSOugcshE0wEBEXXk719SHhWNgfplthC3lqW0E3EqO\r
31         gW4b1GUn/JRXriEiGjmPyCN/vJSdtVJbB1owx+4OUNzAwZOt9UqQD8bUvFzRQuwjVNOt\r
32         B0bq/A1KExYG0rUbj2CE6jh3nE36owOt9xXvo=\r
33 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
34         h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
35         :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
36         b=skjBa6tFqYaUwfsVrNJTnfkqom8DOtxXYOghD7nKw+WPyuG6R/EDJ74PM6765V4K/9\r
37         zX93wen2Uf5gy7UUWfMsMUR08etRSGP6/iXXRgytf4QewzO7p3m9pawK8RfW+BcWBu0Y\r
38         vsrGj3WQG1pF7IGpp0QW2S8LOmusdvRVvZxkk=\r
39 Received: by 10.204.46.134 with SMTP id j6mr2871310bkf.112.1298403762842;\r
40         Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:42:42 -0800 (PST)\r
41 Received: from hecate.student.uu.se (nl110-96-173.student.uu.se\r
42         [130.242.96.173])\r
43         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w3sm4765298bkt.17.2011.02.22.11.42.41\r
44         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
45         Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:42:42 -0800 (PST)\r
46 Sender: Albin Stjerna <albin.stjerna@gmail.com>\r
47 From: Albin Stjerna <albin@eval.nu>\r
48 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
49 Subject: Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based\r
50         citation\r
51 In-Reply-To: <4D640194.2040104@fifthhorseman.net>\r
52 References: <878vx8c4on.fsf@hecate.student.uu.se>\r
53         <4D640194.2040104@fifthhorseman.net>\r
54 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-11-g7ae1494 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
55         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
56 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:42:52 +0100\r
57 Message-ID: <8762sbdfer.fsf@hecate.student.uu.se>\r
58 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
59 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
60         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
61 Cc: , notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
62 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
63 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
64 Precedence: list\r
65 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
66         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
67 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
69 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
70 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
71 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
72 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
73         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
74 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:42:45 -0000\r
75 \r
76 --=-=-=\r
77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
78 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
79 \r
80 On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:33:56 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.=\r
81 net> wrote:\r
82 > i think the correct solution would have nothing to do with text/html vs\r
83 > text/plain, but would have to do with whether the message is\r
84 > multipart/mixed or multipart/alternative.\r
85 \r
86 Thanks for pointing that out =E2=80=94 I see my poor knowledge of MIME is s=\r
87 howing.\r
88 \r
89 Of course, that sounds like the correct thing to do. However, I'm\r
90 looking for a (reasonably) quick fix, and what you're suggesting sounds\r
91 like a re-design of at least a part of the MUA. Isn't there an easier way?\r
92 \r
93 --=-=-=\r
94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
95 \r
96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
97 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
98 \r
99 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJNZBG8AAoJENEsx6vBGurC5ycIAMaDRRaKOOACCkGrnCDaF4u8\r
100 xb6zmnnfu663yt3F0h6Ttyp+oOZdPnjC6xLbLRQ3pYqXL8MydFcWZf0zCqBz7ofZ\r
101 ESnh2gRHuOqC5HqxLjClf08+Ubpfdqr1239x1bpewBr6izzwhFzg+UyNAxBntFae\r
102 iS8rWhYR/ycfphyPm7GO3vS4/jMK15IlTby4dezypKNVjlTfLcTPkgfbmcZ38QHf\r
103 i4/9a8V7sZ1KfdP9+Wxg+y+EpokT+o7i8paxNawGwTernPJ8dPo4TJSO6j8JT4EL\r
104 YnUZzHS4vXw0ke1/XvwyZVOo+TIAd3pPr8IYvM9H36E5Jp9QYAvCfhV+cm/x8kI=\r
105 =qOQ7\r
106 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
107 --=-=-=--\r