From e119ef908cf6c2bda760af39240353b5637f05ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:07:37 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH 6/8] cli: add support for batch tagging operations to "notmuch tag" --- db/1e6e2712b038298a18895a7cfa8efe8c5b4767 | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 164 insertions(+) create mode 100644 db/1e6e2712b038298a18895a7cfa8efe8c5b4767 diff --git a/db/1e6e2712b038298a18895a7cfa8efe8c5b4767 b/db/1e6e2712b038298a18895a7cfa8efe8c5b4767 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..35c5947eb --- /dev/null +++ b/db/1e6e2712b038298a18895a7cfa8efe8c5b4767 @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E60431FB6 + for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:07:40 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.699 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id d7ZL+kMrJkhd for ; + Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com + [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9E9431FAE + for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by pbcuo1 with SMTP id uo1so5525664pbc.26 + for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:07:38 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; + bh=K0lWuLMCbW08EidSK5qhMzZSCQgtSzrH+awnJPThNpc=; + b=UXON5g+cgx+0//PFDEkWirHtlpm7RhjlHZMm3+eOV3m0gt5I9o5QjQIfuzXfD7t3zj + YbKMe8vae+K8GyxY3HQaHKENe8lWWMewe/Qy4jcznRD43kj/+nlKeJZIQtpRbugP0vDO + RtxZSqI3JZAlaQsR+nTv8ePSkacjEhtF8PmqhLgPNRZA33670EmcQH2bOLYSa252EHPd + TWsLWVkxQ443ivyhunldIN5wYzrt37yHVHR6S9/f+0dLBPcKXvMbkJheM3HemAcR6z2F + Fzyi8RSQArBaAlRVTVbEeT576qkr7Rm2ssl1ui9L+46UdDFXS/6fV2keH8LDyN/UCGTx + d1AA== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.68.202.195 with SMTP id kk3mr23240520pbc.96.1333400858147; + Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:07:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.68.231.104 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:07:37 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.68.231.104 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:07:37 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <87iphh50hz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +References: + + <87ty123tpc.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <87aa2tc22z.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <87iphh50hz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:07:37 +0300 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] cli: add support for batch tagging operations to + "notmuch tag" +From: Jani Nikula +To: Jameson Graef Rollins +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15b1077e3c0c04bcb89424 +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQmPpnoDWPkx8LvRtTcUUgONe0ZOeRYd1+7dVfyh4s33w6TrazmMhv27FexAxVirSJZicLje +Cc: Notmuch Mail +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:07:40 -0000 + +--047d7b15b1077e3c0c04bcb89424 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Apr 2, 2012 11:42 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" +wrote: +> +> On Mon, Apr 02 2012, David Bremner wrote: +> > Jameson Graef Rollins writes: +> >> On Sat, Mar 31 2012, Jani Nikula wrote: +> >>> Add support for batch tagging operations through stdin to "notmuch +> >>> tag". This can be enabled with the new --stdin command line option to +> >>> "notmuch new". The input must consist of lines of the format: +> >>> +> >>> T +|- [...] [--] +> >> +> > +> > I think that's my fault. I was imagining a possible future line-oriented +> > notmuch server and having various actions/queries possible. It seems a +> > bit blue sky at this point, but it does give extesibility fairly +> > cheaply. +> +> But then why not just make the command explicit, and just have the first +> field be "tag"? +> +> But then I wonder why do we even need any of this at all? Isn't it this +> just exactly equivalent to: +> +> xargs -l notmuch +> ?? + +Batch tagging brings performance and atomicity by opening and closing the +db only once. The hex encoding handles insane message ids and tags. +Otherwise there should be no difference. + +Jani. + +> +> jamie. + +--047d7b15b1077e3c0c04bcb89424 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +


+On Apr 2, 2012 11:42 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:= +
+>
+> On Mon, Apr 02 2012, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
+> > Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:
+> >> On Sat, Mar 31 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
+> >>> Add support for batch tagging operations through stdin to= + "notmuch
+> >>> tag". This can be enabled with the new --stdin comma= +nd line option to
+> >>> "notmuch new". The input must consist of lines = +of the format:
+> >>>
+> >>> T +<tag>|-<tag> [...] [--] <search-terms&g= +t;
+> >>
+> >
+> > I think that's my fault. I was imagining a possible future li= +ne-oriented
+> > notmuch server and having various actions/queries possible. It se= +ems a
+> > bit blue sky at this point, but it does give extesibility fairly<= +br> +> > cheaply.
+>
+> But then why not just make the command explicit, and just have the fir= +st
+> field be "tag"?
+>
+> But then I wonder why do we even need any of this at all? =C2=A0Isn= +9;t it this
+> just exactly equivalent to:
+>
+> xargs -l notmuch <commands.txt
+>
+> ??

+

Batch tagging brings performance and atomicity by opening and closing th= +e db only once. The hex encoding handles insane message ids and tags. Other= +wise there should be no difference.

+

Jani.

+

>
+> jamie.
+

+ +--047d7b15b1077e3c0c04bcb89424-- -- 2.26.2