From d94d1c25a33abb6649b2c152d760793b4279041a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Kevin J. McCarthy" Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:54:26 +1700 Subject: [PATCH] Re: notmuch-mutt: support for duplicate message removal --- 83/e728cc43ec3f345fb88ebcfe53a56ff5c45b3c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 83/e728cc43ec3f345fb88ebcfe53a56ff5c45b3c diff --git a/83/e728cc43ec3f345fb88ebcfe53a56ff5c45b3c b/83/e728cc43ec3f345fb88ebcfe53a56ff5c45b3c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dfea8ffdc --- /dev/null +++ b/83/e728cc43ec3f345fb88ebcfe53a56ff5c45b3c @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C2B431FAF + for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 1R377PjVsf6o for ; + Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com + [66.111.4.29]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 117E9431FAE + for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) + by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474AB20268; + Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:54:29 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) + by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:54:29 -0400 +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=8t8.us; h=date + :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version + :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=VasT2jirgyxU6jX4i01cbM1d + t0o=; b=RkxS1WcP0mZoN7vy8pIG+4XjeUXZ2JcLRPdizPOguJxJErkrU5fmZZEo + Ry1FcvET3KfMh9N73tixXC9OobVRNWgqXs4mjkg5ATp5z0vBtgA5a3X1Uoz/LVao + DN7ltpoa8MLV0vn3p4mDGU4bZyt2yVUrZkXRyiku725uRr8cpaw= +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= + messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id + :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; + bh=VasT2jirgyxU6jX4i01cbM1dt0o=; b=Y0q0zZqs2uUQQrlsQLc6EbvgBfDm + K7YKCfmIZ95WH6sOh0f0k2t0NT052mVhk17TK9UJVXKgUzvSoZdE6qwbJXX2im67 + UDhHZ1fRj2PE2F5f4lvOsQZUuTChp93Cu4yBDRUKd6I2GPKAFA2htovsurwnLLc6 + oPjxnQoNuLeeoP8= +X-Sasl-enc: 6XcJaIzcpF5pVi0DPiLl7yDm2Q+0rDa4eyPOWFItdbZh 1343843668 +Received: from localhost (unknown [71.220.203.171]) + by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9E378E0105; + Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:54:28 -0400 (EDT) +Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:54:26 -0700 +From: "Kevin J. McCarthy" +To: Jani Nikula +Subject: Re: notmuch-mutt: support for duplicate message removal +Message-ID: <20120801175426.GA14470@zaogao.lan> +References: <1343808582-9519-1-git-send-email-zack@upsilon.cc> + <87pq7aam8n.fsf@nikula.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <87pq7aam8n.fsf@nikula.org> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:02:31 -0700 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Stefano Zacchiroli +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:54:31 -0000 + +Jani Nikula wrote: +> I'm guessing you get the duplicates because you have dupes in the mail +> store, and 'notmuch search --output=files' prints all the filenames +> associated with each matching message, rather than any other reason. The +> presented approach will only remove identical files, and will leave +> behind files that are basically the same message, but have differing +> headers, e.g. due to being received through different channels. Is this +> what you want? + +This method was something we felt comfortable enabling by default. + +Stefano and I discussed adding a (by default off) option to remove +duplicates by message-id, but wanted to get this patch merged first and +then think about it. + +> Perhaps an option to 'notmuch search --output=files' to print only one +> filename (even if there are many) per message would be interesting. + +This would be useful for the second approach. If it's easy to do, that +would be great. + +-Kevin + -- 2.26.2