From c3d7e1c04cc8b36aee26f4dd14a6dcae4bcf790e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Wolfe Gordon Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 07:21:45 +1700 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [alot] reply from search mode --- 29/d077f77027a1eba7db093f1dafbbc61364bb2c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) create mode 100644 29/d077f77027a1eba7db093f1dafbbc61364bb2c diff --git a/29/d077f77027a1eba7db093f1dafbbc61364bb2c b/29/d077f77027a1eba7db093f1dafbbc61364bb2c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..84e0c0041 --- /dev/null +++ b/29/d077f77027a1eba7db093f1dafbbc61364bb2c @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33ADC431FBC + for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:21:48 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id QsL7raW+xGH5 for ; + Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:21:47 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com + [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + 78934431FAE for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:21:47 -0800 + (PST) +Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so3264144eek.26 + for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:21:46 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.112.82.6 with SMTP id e6mr803733lby.31.1331130106050; Wed, 07 + Mar 2012 06:21:46 -0800 (PST) +Sender: awg@xvx.ca +Received: by 10.112.109.234 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:21:45 -0800 (PST) +X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56] +In-Reply-To: <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> +References: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com> + <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> +Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:21:45 -0700 +X-Google-Sender-Auth: fNxWfj66jbu_A_oA4OedkYYpcNM +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: [alot] reply from search mode +From: Adam Wolfe Gordon +To: Patrick Totzke +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQlbocWlHm4jzJfUCdjy02UNEuh/5Vmmwi64UPsgAeBU9u2rA9D9ntnDr/0rJqYsbKGSFTO6 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:21:48 -0000 + +On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 14:17, Patrick Totzke + wrote: +> Quoting Philippe LeCavalier (2012-03-06 16:00:16) +>>How would I add a reply key binding to reply directly from the search +>>mode. ie something like R. Forward and editnew would be nice as well. +> +> This could indeed be useful, but I'm not convinced this is a great idea in general: +> What would that command do if your selection is a thread with multiple leaf-mails? +> reply to the first? ask the user? + +It's worth noting that this question is unresolved for Notmuch in +general. My reply patchset disables the CLI reply command for searches +returning multiple messages, which will also disable this +functionality in emacs. Right now it "works", but doesn't really +produce desirable behavior. -- 2.26.2