From c2beebd09101dafa21aa218e77d4e2c4897013fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:37:25 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Re: post-new [was: Re: query on a subset of messages ?] --- 53/0dc5f24710dc38fe85d0d5546770b830efcffb | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+) create mode 100644 53/0dc5f24710dc38fe85d0d5546770b830efcffb diff --git a/53/0dc5f24710dc38fe85d0d5546770b830efcffb b/53/0dc5f24710dc38fe85d0d5546770b830efcffb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cea89c3de --- /dev/null +++ b/53/0dc5f24710dc38fe85d0d5546770b830efcffb @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25F2431FBF + for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:37:27 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.699 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id YFSYAJIJu8rv for ; + Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:37:27 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com + [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D47431FAE + for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:37:27 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by obbup19 with SMTP id up19so16583485obb.26 + for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; + bh=tCyp2czltVGCb6GIFTrSOanjB7Fxm0diYuexzsJpIKA=; + b=C07m4m32Ikl24Mp8kMEwnR9DkIHHNNVjvPu1nU0oryD18vkBMaQpJK1I/QvKwKJ2LL + xCHjUilhg9EUOYt4u4ayQoGNlK10Br7vGpm+Qtriir9I2hWliBJyNDXX6JLhSSFZudCF + a+yN5ftJNS1yl636bPYDIPJ4Duijprx4Z9qB91I3OUjqtLES2ocamXaQqFW5BdcQj9nN + 8YNg5G1Gf1e5d0ShvDrOMhWn5zzzmP+XABO1ZNDWkDLPNUB5Cr1NUe+s2xBwAJfRJizg + 7G7OeqonPMlDrvFtDgQilwvEQzDWvm2QYG3DLP4Xs7mlc+UYUfC+mrWj0ttI66ZDU3zJ + ys9A== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.182.64.69 with SMTP id m5mr21856783obs.40.1341855445730; Mon, + 09 Jul 2012 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.76.10.102 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.76.10.102 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <8739503llz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +References: <871ukl5oj7.fsf@cern.ch> <87ehol2aku.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <87wr2c3mtj.fsf@cern.ch> <87r4sk3lxu.fsf@cern.ch> + <8739503llz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:37:25 +0300 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: post-new [was: Re: query on a subset of messages ?] +From: Jani Nikula +To: Jameson Graef Rollins +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93a157d2ec3cc04c4691136 +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQkn8IL/mW+HXm86U1oW/+45oFfXWNbZyUM4c8CJbD8A3tWd/OyQnGv/35eMlFbc/IUTxzun +Cc: Notmuch Mail , Sebastien Binet +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:37:28 -0000 + +--14dae93a157d2ec3cc04c4691136 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Jul 9, 2012 8:12 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" +wrote: +> +> On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Sebastien Binet wrote: +> > hum... is post-new supposed to be run even if there is no new message ? +> +> Hi, Sebastian. Yes, I think it runs regardless if there are any new +> messages or not. + +That's correct; only errors in notmuch new cause post-new hook to be +skipped. + +> +> jamie. +> +> _______________________________________________ +> notmuch mailing list +> notmuch@notmuchmail.org +> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch +> + +--14dae93a157d2ec3cc04c4691136 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +


+On Jul 9, 2012 8:12 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:<= +br> +>
+> On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Sebastien Binet <binet@cern.ch> wrote:
+> > hum... is post-new supposed to be run even if there is no new mes= +sage ?
+>
+> Hi, Sebastian. =C2=A0Yes, I think it runs regardless if there are any = +new
+> messages or not.

+

That's correct; only errors in notmuch new cause post-new hook to be= + skipped.

+

>
+> jamie.
+>
+> _______________________________________________
+> notmuch mailing list
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org= +
+> http://not= +muchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+>
+

+ +--14dae93a157d2ec3cc04c4691136-- -- 2.26.2