From bef7ed2cacdc12fdfcbe0b80fcd55a8ee5ab448c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:28:23 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Re: notmuch-mutt: support for duplicate message removal --- ab/69c94aae57641dddfd613841e1c89b4f0fc454 | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ab/69c94aae57641dddfd613841e1c89b4f0fc454 diff --git a/ab/69c94aae57641dddfd613841e1c89b4f0fc454 b/ab/69c94aae57641dddfd613841e1c89b4f0fc454 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..251bae031 --- /dev/null +++ b/ab/69c94aae57641dddfd613841e1c89b4f0fc454 @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6EC431FBC + for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:28:30 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id F+3fk-70rifR for ; + Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:28:28 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com + [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449D0431FAE + for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:28:28 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so599201lbb.26 + for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:28:26 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date + :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; + bh=lrruiLSiq7gsQIbyr/tpU/8iXkcf6Qt+c5MfiitwaKA=; + b=VNmFs054GgQ+EGMWm1s8+7zAwLxaoroG5cWb2gt6AioGuiad2ocnaC/kTh5LZRucBZ + JF+iwRmXXCjphVNjjqoRaGLQlP6xMOucrC/0Efp8zgNQ78LvPs/nSX94zLcqVUBZikpf + ICJwX0PwPKWKiyKF9jhxV1qK2UcnRuBNj67nIf+TC132ObO7Yodf+SJiIDSX07BQMwnR + lhOXJB8qDAFYD3oQjPSjAfymr9LMyjNsl3lrMs+e/hrH0BBwWtNMqK2+81d5s/XGWFAS + XUFnRWoSsFXTCfub/DLvx02fbLtZ2qrMCCH4uCdQF6+xbI/3bmQg2Ouw7Xt5LAzCf1ff + pF8w== +Received: by 10.112.11.38 with SMTP id n6mr8296820lbb.82.1343849306601; + Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:28:26 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe51df00-27.dhcp.inet.fi. + [80.223.81.27]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg4sm3715193lab.11.2012.08.01.12.28.24 + (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:28:25 -0700 (PDT) +From: Jani Nikula +To: "Kevin J. McCarthy" +Subject: Re: notmuch-mutt: support for duplicate message removal +In-Reply-To: <20120801175426.GA14470@zaogao.lan> +References: <1343808582-9519-1-git-send-email-zack@upsilon.cc> + <87pq7aam8n.fsf@nikula.org> <20120801175426.GA14470@zaogao.lan> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+104~gaee3080 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 + (i686-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:28:23 +0300 +Message-ID: <87a9yev2co.fsf@nikula.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQnnOXS5TdkzxPrz6pKF7FwxFXsNTI8znZHY92KG4UddTBDF23coryEPowYml/KWyt7MgwFB +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Stefano Zacchiroli +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:28:30 -0000 + +On Wed, 01 Aug 2012, "Kevin J. McCarthy" wrote: +> Jani Nikula wrote: +>> I'm guessing you get the duplicates because you have dupes in the mail +>> store, and 'notmuch search --output=files' prints all the filenames +>> associated with each matching message, rather than any other reason. The +>> presented approach will only remove identical files, and will leave +>> behind files that are basically the same message, but have differing +>> headers, e.g. due to being received through different channels. Is this +>> what you want? +> +> This method was something we felt comfortable enabling by default. +> +> Stefano and I discussed adding a (by default off) option to remove +> duplicates by message-id, but wanted to get this patch merged first and +> then think about it. + +Sounds reasonable, especially considering [1]. I have no comments on the +patches; I'm not a notmuch-mutt (or perl) user. + +>> Perhaps an option to 'notmuch search --output=files' to print only one +>> filename (even if there are many) per message would be interesting. +> +> This would be useful for the second approach. If it's easy to do, that +> would be great. + +Apart from [1], the hardest part will be bikeshedding about the option +name. ;) + +BR, +Jani. + +[1] id:"87d33av2sg.fsf@nikula.org" -- 2.26.2