From bd1c1e1fa1d1a328fe003d8cf864f3cb68ee63e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 16:21:02 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Batch tagging - add id_list as tag possible? --- 73/06133532a2d995d629efbc57a96dd28c8e4a65 | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 73/06133532a2d995d629efbc57a96dd28c8e4a65 diff --git a/73/06133532a2d995d629efbc57a96dd28c8e4a65 b/73/06133532a2d995d629efbc57a96dd28c8e4a65 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5248200b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/73/06133532a2d995d629efbc57a96dd28c8e4a65 @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF21431FBD + for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id GXWE9RlH--5V for ; + Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500E7431FAF + for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa + (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1UBsw6-0000bi-0S; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:21:38 -0400 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1UBsvW-0005fE-84; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:21:02 -0400 +From: David Bremner +To: Rainer M Krug +Subject: Re: Batch tagging - add id_list as tag possible? +In-Reply-To: + +References: + + <871ubx7pa8.fsf@zancas.localnet> + +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+32~g16aa65b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:21:02 -0400 +Message-ID: <87ppzh5z9t.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Spam_bar: - +Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:21:39 -0000 + +Rainer M Krug writes: + +> On Saturday, March 2, 2013, David Bremner wrote: + +>> > It would be great if I could have +>> > +%id_list +>> > +>> > And it would automatically tag my mails with the list I'd? +>> +>> It should be possible to script that, using e.g. formail to extract the +>> list id. +> +> But this would be done outside the batch tagging - correct? +> + +Yes + +> I think tagging based on a header would be a powerful and useful feature, +> especially for tagging of lists. + +I don't know about your use case, but I think for most people being able +to search on more headers (including e.g. List-Id) would be convenient +replacement for such "autotagging". This is something that many people +have requested/talked-about, but so far nobody has done the work. + +d -- 2.26.2